this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
12 points (87.5% liked)

Chess

1924 readers
1 users here now

Play chess on-line

FIDE Rankings

September 2023

# Player Country Elo
1 Magnus Carlsen ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด 2839
2 Fabiano Caruana ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ 2786
3 Hikaru Nakamura ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ 2780
4 Ding Liren ๐Ÿ† ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ 2780
5 Alireza Firouzja ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท 2777
6 Ian Nepomniachtchi ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ 2771
7 Anish Giri ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ 2760
8 Gukesh D ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ 2758
9 Viswanathan Anand ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ 2754
10 Wesley So ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ 2753

Tournaments

Speed Chess Championship 2023

September 4 - September 22

Check also

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For black, between QGD and Slav/Semi-slav, which do you prefer and why? I am trying to understand what is appealing on both sides and why you make the tradeoff of potentially blocking in the your light square bishop. Personally, I respond with the Nimzo Indian as black, and when playing as white I hope for QGA or Catalan.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I'm no expert on these options for black, but I play QG as white and see this position all the time. QGD seems so cramped for black, but when I see black play Slav, it (anecdotally, and at my level) seems to work out better for me. It feels like it forces a lot of development on the Queen's side first for both, which is what I want to do in QG anyway.

[โ€“] maggio@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I play the Semi-slav with black, but just thats just by Chance. However, I agree with this comment, and also the fact that far fewer play the Semi-slav, might help you.

Semi-slav is a good tradeoff between solid and dynamic. Not as dynamic as the Grรผnfeld, but can still give interesting positions.

[โ€“] Ponziani@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Do you ever see tactical opportunities in a typical semi Slav game? From the white side it seems to remain positional the entire time in my experience. I guess that's subject to change upon hanging pieces or blunders.

[โ€“] maggio@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 8 months ago

In my case only if they play the Bg5 line, then you can have a wild game. If they play the Meeran (usually 5.e3) it ends up being more positional,but keeping all pieces and pawns on the board.

[โ€“] Ponziani@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for your reply. It is difficult to account for move order and transpositions but i feel like i see the slav response about 50% of the time. Until i study it more, im often opting to exchange the central pawns and then just develop my pieces as white. Unlike in other pawn exchange openings like the French exchange or Caro kann exchange, i feel like for whatever reason it doesnt dry out too badly. If i stopped playing the Nimzo Indian i feel like i would opt for the slav but only after closing the pawn structure after getting my bishop out. Because i don't play this as black, I'm not sure if I'd try to hang onto that bishop once its out and prone to attack or try to keep it in the game, i don't think its worth the time trying to make space for it to retreat. Meanwhile when i used to play QGD it felt too cramped and i never felt like i had the tempi to devote to trying to fianchetto the light square bishop.

You know, I keep hearing about the Nimzo Indian, but I've never looked it up. You may have just given me my next defense to study!

[โ€“] Ponziani@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

I will add i love the opportunity to transpose into the caro kann after 1. d4 c6 for white since i feel more prepared for it.

[โ€“] AresUII@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Neither. Tarrasch, QGA or Chigorin so you can actually develop everything.