318
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

As reported exclusively by russian sources at the moment, he lost consciousness after a walking hour and prison medics were unsuccessful in reanimating him, as per sources in УФСИН (government body regulating prisons and punishment). He was 47 years old at that time. The last time he was heard of he was moved from Moscow-based prison into the IK-3 named Polar Wolf, a penal colony located in a permafrost region near the town of Harp, where he found his end.

No other sources commented on that by now. At that time, there's no independent proof of that or other explanations but the one given by prison authorities.

A fitting reminder is that presidential elections are to be held in 15-17 of March, meaning it happened exactly one month prior to them.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] wildcardology@lemmy.world 51 points 7 months ago

Russia desperately needs another revolution.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 21 points 7 months ago

Not another neoliberal shock therapy revolution, like Atlantic Council / New American Century stans want, it doesn’t.

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I'm just now making the connection that the overtly fascist "shock doctrine" is directly tied to the neoliberal "shock therapy" (kind of like how "third way liberalism" and "third position fascism" have the same definition)

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

When you look at what happened to Chile, you come to realize that neoclassical / neoliberal / Chicago School economics and neocolonialism are very closely related.

IMO, neoclassical economics is a wildly successful psyop, such that it has become hegemonic in all capitalist countries. It’s an absolute garbage theory and yet is canon at every university, outside of perhaps China and the few other socialist states. Marxist economist Michael Hudson has helped me unlearn a lot of junk economics.

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago

I unlearned junk economics through youtube and memes 😂

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 7 months ago

Radhika Desai & Michael Hudson’s Geopolitical Economy Hour YouTube series is excellent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago
[-] Beer_Raccoon@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Correct. Bad revolution is bad but good revolution would be good.

[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 16 points 7 months ago

I don't know how you are proficient in russian history, but we have a thing called гонка на лафетах. At some point soviet administration grew that old they all died off in a decade, without coming up with a next gen of rulers. I feel like in a coming decade there would be a lot of funerals and the new chaotic 90s for Russia, Iran, that would be very painful for these nations, but it'd be another chance to start it right, at least as a lib democracy. People say I'm too dumb and optimistic, but there's still no successor to Putin and he's born in 1952, and the clocks are ticking. He and his friends are just to afraid to lose their place so they don't bother with that, meaning it would be a complete hell when they'd die one by one.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago

This framing sounds like great man theory, which is popular with liberals but not with historical materialists.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] shea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 7 months ago

that's interesting to hear from your perspective, thanks for the insight. When I read these headlines I always wonder what real Russians think

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

Definitely not one which Alexei "Caucasians are cockroaches" Navalny would have anything to do with.

[-] knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 7 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago

First USA, pwetty pwease? No Dem or Rep or Bernies.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 19 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Weird how western media is all over Navalny when Assange is being tortured in solitary as we speak. I guess the reason is shared values https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yba-LJ8clgc

also some mainstream western media reporting on Navalny

In 2021, a BBC article reported even Amnesty International was forced to strip Navalny's "prisoner of conscience" status for the violence and hate he unremorsefully promoted https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-56181084

That same month, US government-funded Radio Free Europe likewise was forced to concede Navalny's extremist background https://www.rferl.org/a/navalny-failure-to-renounce-nationalist-past-support/31122014.html

[-] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml 12 points 7 months ago

100 lolmericans coming to explain to you how Australian journalist was Russian agent in 3 2 1... oh wait this is not Reddit.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago

The difference in discourse on an open platform compared to a corporate walled garden in a nutshell.

[-] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml 10 points 7 months ago

╮(︶▽︶)╭

Now I feel irregular heartbeats whenever I see mainstream reddit political posts (rarely). Lemmy is a lot more peaceful.

[-] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Is not "shared values," the main reason is that Navalny pushes the current USA narrative/propaganda of "Putin bad." Not defending or saying Putin is a saint, sometimes, the best way to push Propaganda messaging is to use convient truths when applicable or when they align. This is not new, like at all. Russia, China, the UK, et al do it.

Assange does not push that narrative, quite the opposite that the USA Goverment can be highly hypocritical and that it can also commit war crimes and that it spies on its citizens, like what Snowden revealed, too. This is why the USA has tried to made Assange's life a total living hell and the main stream media barely touches on it.

Remember when the NYT, among others sold lies from the Feds to push the war on Iraq? I 'member.

Not the best bit this touches on it.

https://fair.org/home/20-years-later-nyt-still-cant-face-its-iraq-war-shame/

[-] mellowheat@suppo.fi 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

What was Navalny's alleged crime and what is Assange's alleged crime?

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 13 points 7 months ago

Navalny is a far right nationalist and white supremacist and was charged with establishing an extremist community. The RFA and BBC articles I linked in the comment you're replying to provide the details. Assange's crime was reporting on US military murdering civilians in cold blood.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

I've already written a long comment about him and his significance to Russia as I see it living here, with all his failings. You can check it in my post history.

He had a lot of shitstains on his white clothes, but what's important - is that he shut up about any of his politics and acted as a clever manager who took everyone in opposition to establishment together, for once they didn't fight each other and acted as a one. It wasn't enough as we see now, and they started to fight each other once again after he was incarcerated, but he tried. And I respect him for that. His death in captivity isn't right.

I didn't have time to research what Assange got at that moment, so I'd not comment on that.

[-] nekandro@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

I love when all my racist fascists unify into a single opposition party. Surely they won't do anything untoward like, say, forcing Reichstag members to vote for the Enabling Act in 1933 to give them "temporary" powers, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

Navalny is a shit stain of a human being and anybody who defends him or tries to white wash him is utterly morally bankrupt. He has never been an actual opposition to Putin, nor has he gained any popularity. And that's a very good thing because his views are absolutely heinous. The fact that you respect a fascist should make you do a bit of self reflection.

[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

I'd love to have a speak with you IRL.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 10 points 7 months ago
[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 33 points 7 months ago

Take it with a grain of salt as I'm from here and I can't be objective about him or local politics.

At the start of his political career before 2011 it was all over the place, including nationalistic marshes, pro-gun rhetoric and basic agitation against funding national republics of Caucasus (they have negative balance and are helped by dotations from the center). Not to the levels of actual fascist like NOD or Dugin fans, but still very shitty. It's still argued if he was opportunistic or genuinelly supported all of that, and it's pointless imho. I can see most average persons from some Volgograd or Tambov saying the same or worse. Yet - he was caught on camera and it's forever archived.

After co-triggering Bolotnaya and other demonstrations he dropped that pov and got onto the platform of fighting corruption, to get honest, legit elections and tried to elect himself and other oppositioners into power. Since that, he came to be pro-European and anti-Putin politician. His program was basically that — let's retire these old friends and partners, who in his opinion are a middle between a mafia and a late soviet nomenclature. and see if a peaceful transfer to some more liberal Russia is possible. He wasn't all that savvy about making an original program, but he was a talented organizer and public speaker that put a lot of orgs and people together for numerous protest actions, he became a face of a brand for all public anti-establishment talks, a man and a vehicle if you will.

The other bad thing many remember was in 2014, where he was asked about the faith of Crimea and he said 'it's not a sandwich for it to casually change hands' for what he had backlash for years to come, even though he tried to walk it back and explain many times after that. It too was a stain on his reputation, but imho after seeing how failing ratings of Putin jumped over Crimea's capture and how regular people celebrated it (and forgot that Luhansk and Donetsk were on fire at the same time), he could've thought he'd shoot himself in the foot by vouching against it – although Nemtsov, the soon-to-be-dead oppositioner I liked more, did just that.

I'd say he doesn't really have any politics, so he's probably a liberal europe-centric politician. If he could become the next pres, he wouldn't probably change anything but introducing democratisation and transparency of the government. His value for me and other angry russians is that he collected a lot of other oppositional persons who usually waste all their time arguing with each other and nitpicking each other's words. He's not the best, like mentioned Nemtsov or Novodvorskaya, but he was alive and he did something when most were passive.

I hope I answered your curiosity. If you held some vision of him asking that (I think you do, since you are from lemmy.ml) lay it there. This person was very complicated and there were many different opinions about him from a kremlin agent, to a fascist, to a savior, to a rubber duck. Whatever, I feel like he didn't deserve dying in prison like that, thus I was very displeased hearing he's dead.

[-] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 15 points 7 months ago

Nice answer, thank you.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago

Let's be honest, Navalny was a nationalist right wing scumbag who thought 90s reforms were a good thing. There was zero chance of him ever becoming a prominent political figure in Russia because liberalism is a discredited ideology for most Russians today.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] muad_dibber@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 months ago

Muslims are cockroaches, Crimea deserved it, deep nationalism.

Basically, fascism with a 21st century coat of paint.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ComradeChairmanKGB@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It is my absolute pleasure to introduce the new leader of the opposition party. Seven time former acting president Juan Guaido!

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

was pronounced dead

Must have gotten a surprise visit from the Juche necromancer

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2024
318 points (98.2% liked)

World News

32076 readers
1424 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS