this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2024
112 points (97.5% liked)

Games

16799 readers
577 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hannes3120@feddit.de 48 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"Whenever something closes in the UK, intellectual property rights revert 50% to the original creator and 50% to the Crown

Wtf - how is something like this still law and people are okay with it?

[–] explodicle@local106.com 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If they're already okay with IP in general, then it doesn't seem like much of a stretch. The whole thing is imaginary, arbitrary, and couldn't exist without the King's government.

Why do you want to steal from the king? :-P

[–] ModsAreCopsACAB@lemm.ee -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Are you seriously defending it? Why don't we attach you along with all monarchs to some cement and drop you in some river? Would be strictly beneficial for society.

[–] explodicle@local106.com 4 points 9 months ago

Well, I guess as long as it's good for the economy.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

It sure would be helpful if there was an automatic release of property if no one does anything with it for 25 years.

[–] Ross_audio@lemmy.world 30 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Even if no one does anything, the first book was published 40 years ago. It won't leave copyright for another 62 years.

Copyright is too long.

Yeah, it should probably be ~15 years, and maybe extendable once if the original author is still alive.

That's enough to profit from the work, but not so long as to stifle innovation.

[–] Maultasche@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

I would love a Discworld Trilogy re-release. They are one of the funniest 90s point and click adventures.

[–] ignism@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

We only have rights to the characters, not the games

How does that work? Gregg didn’t create original characters here.

[–] geissi@feddit.de 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It's a million-to-one chance, but it might just work!

[–] TheActualDevil@sffa.community 4 points 9 months ago

A million-to-one chance happens 9 times out of 10.

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 2 points 9 months ago

Sounds more like half a million-to-one, maybe they should flip a coin to get a nice round number

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

On the cards, not in them???

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

British version of the saying.

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Colloquialisms aren't up their wheelhouse.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Never heard yours before, thanks!

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

~~king~~ prince charles thanks x