this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
15 points (100.0% liked)

Furry Technologists

1315 readers
3 users here now

Science, Technology, and pawbs

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sanols@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Super cool, there should be more competition between Map providers like Apple/Google/OpenStreetMaps.

Why couldn’t this project have just been things being added to OSM?

[–] dressupgeekout@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My thought exactly -- why not contribute to OpenStreetMap?

[–] sanols@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So they actually are contributing / complementing OSM:

Overture is a data-centric map project, not a community of individual map editors. Therefore, Overture is intended to be complementary to OSM. We combine OSM with other sources to produce new open map data sets. Overture data will be available for use by the OpenStreetMap community under compatible open data licenses. Overture members are encouraged to contribute to OSM directly.

From the FAQs on their site.

[–] dressupgeekout@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] sanols@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

It’s kinda funny; everywhere I saw this posted had the same initial comments, “what about OSM?” Which I think is natural and good skepticism.

Hopefully, they keep true to their word instead of creating the same problem.

[–] Faoluin@pawb.social 4 points 1 year ago

Steering members: Microsoft, Facebook, Amazon, TomTom. They won't contribute to OSM because they don't want map data to be free for everyone; they just don't like Google and Apple being in charge of it.