this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
399 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

59243 readers
3437 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

EU passes law to blanket highways with fast EV chargers by 2025::The chargers must be placed every 60km (37mi) and allow ad-hoc payment by card or contactless device without subscriptions.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tocano@lemmy.ml 44 points 1 year ago (15 children)

One of the major reasons people shy away from EV is the range. This is great to bring more people to EVs.

However, what policies is EU passing to improve the network of public transport such as buses, trams, and trains?

[–] brewery@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

This is just one area of the overall fit for 55 and general EU plans. Public transport is already being looked at under different working groups (e.g. https://rail-research.europa.eu/about-europes-rail/).

The aim of the overall plan look very promising. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/green-deal/fit-for-55-the-eu-plan-for-a-green-transition/

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

People worry about range too much. Over 95% of trips are under 50 miles and less 1% are over 100 miles in the US. I imagine Europeans cover even less distance on average. Every new EV out there will be able to cover 99% of trips. Most newer EVs have at least a 250 mile range which you should probably stop and take a break in that time period anyway.

In the US, our problem is number of home chargers is horrible. A level 1 charger will get you 35-40 mile range each day. That would be perfectly fine for people in apartments and most people in general. Apartment buildings and condos largely do not even have that though. About 14% of people live in apartments and about 5% live in condos. That means a large chunk of the population does not have easy access to charging. A little over a third of Americans rent (houses and apartments). There is not much incentive for am owner to install a level 1 charger let alone install a 240v outlet. That means those people will currently have to give DC fast charging stations. Those are much more expensive, take a long time, and because Electrify America was only done to satisfy VW's legal requirement, many are purely maintained and broken.

That situation is even worse in Europe because there is a higher percentage of people living in flats at about 46%.

[–] HeavyRaptor@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

With the 99% number If you drive every day that's still 3-4 trips a year when your car will be unable to get you to where you want to go. And with electric cars still being very expensive that is not a good look when a much cheaper ICE vehicle has essentially no such limitation.

It doesn't help that I have zero trust in the charging infrastructure in Europe at the moment, so completing this proposal is actually what would make electric cars fully viable in my eyes.

Obviously they are already great if you have 2 vehicles in a household where one can complete the longer trips with ease. You really get to enjoy the many upsides during your daily commute where range isn't really a factor.

[–] HaiZhung@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

You won’t be unable to go, you’ll just have a stopover after 300 miles. You know, like you normally would, anyways.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Seriously. Do people really think EVs will save us from climate change? They are hardly good for the environment. There's already a sustainable EV, it's called a train.

And don't get me started on electrical scooters... How is that more sustainable than a bike....

[–] Chipthemonk@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Although I like big public transportation options, cars are also awesome and won’t be going anywhere for the foreseeable future. I’d rather have electric cars than gas cars as we can generate renewable electricity but not renewable gas.

I’ve seen your argument a few times now. In San Francisco, some folk are protesting self driving cars with cones because they want more public transportation infrastructure. Again, I’m sympathetic—I love public infrastructure. But improving public transportation doesn’t have to be antithetical to EVs.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SoaringDE@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

E-Scooters are much better in conjunction with public transit as they take up much less space and are easier to take up steps to the platform.

As such they are a good personal transportation option to solve the 'last mile'.

I do however think that public, shared E-Scooters are a big nuicance to a citys center especially

[–] orrk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

a lot of the shared E-Scotter thing is local cities not wanting them to exist in the first place, replace a parking spot every once in a while with a scooter collection point and watch as they almost completely disappear from the side of the road, we give the literally worse in every aspect cars their own dedicated infrastructure that is choking our cities, but a scooter? no, that's untenable...

[–] FantasticFox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I don't have anything against trains, but our rail network is really limited.

If I want to go from Barcelona to Madrid, it's easy and actually more convenient than flying albeit more expensive.

But if I want to take my kids to go and see the cool medieval castle in the mountains? There's no train going anywhere near there.

[–] soyagi@yiffit.net 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

In places that don't have EV chargers currently, will it be the state's responsibility to install them?

On Finland's highways highlighted on the ball in that article, there are a lot of existing gas stations that have EV chargers. But there can easily be more than a 60km gap, especially the further north you go. Is it down to the state, local municipality, or EU to fund it?

Furthermore, if a commercial provider, like a gas station shuts down, would some authority be required to at least keep the EV chargers running?

How is the 60km distance calculated? From existing EV chargers? If a gas station closes, the measuring point to/from the next/previous EV charger will change.

I can't imagine the state will want to install EV chargers every 60km in addition to the ones already provided by commercial enterprises such as gas stations. Will they be required to?

[–] brewery@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It says in the article 'Lightly trafficked roads or locations that just don’t make socio-economic sense can be excluded from the requirement' for the comprehensive network.

It'll be up to each country how they decide to implement it. In some countries the core roads are managed by a central government agency so they would need to arrange it. In others it is the the local municipalities or privatised. Some countries will offer to private companies. Others will provide it themselves. The governments would be ultimately responsible but Im sure they can manage this given they already have responsibilities about maintaining the roads and rest areas. In the worst case they might have to pay for some infrastructure themselves but can make it back with the charges.

[–] rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Infrastructure is a big consideration that is sort of glossed over by governments enacting legislation to force the adoption of electric cars. When gas powered cars initially came about, law makers and manufactures had to go to some lengths to set up an infrastructure for fuel delivery and accessibility. It wasn't just about making the cars, a whole system had to be deployed.

Not much thought about infrastructure has gone into the adoption of electric cars. It could easily end up being a situation where there's too many cars and not enough support. The EU is already thinking ahead, but I think its likely the USA will get caught with their pants down.

For example California has already enacted legislation forcing all new cars to electric after 2035, but has not passed any legislation about infrastructure for them. There are over thirty million privately registered cars in California. You need places to charge all of them and support the power demand for it. The power grid in its current state would not be able to do it. They already have problems when existing demand gets too high. So it's not going to be a small issue by any means.

[–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's up to the state to figure out details like that.

If a state does install a charger, they might pass a local law that makes it illegal for commercial chargers to operate nearby - which would ensure the state charger doesn't cost tax payers any money (because a good charger with no competition will run at a profit).

I'm not saying states will do that, but they have the option. The only thing that matters is that there is a charger available, and at competitive prices. I can't imagine why the state would bother though, because again chargers are profitable and commercial enterprises will want to install them.

Realistically the only thing that might stop a charger from being installed along a stretch of highway is if the government doesn't allow it due to zoning issues/etc. This law will force governments to ensure there is appropriately zoned land somewhere along the highway.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I know you mean state as in country, but my state (Ohio) is literally installing millions of dollars worth of charging stations all over our highways.

Ohio is roughly the size of a small-ish EU country, with roughly the population of Belgium.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is great, and ambitious.

I wish it was more ambitious with a fatter timeline.

I'd rather see passive charging lanes added by 2030 or something.

But again, this is great.

[–] Noerttipertti@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Charging lanes are still a pipe dream as long as inductive charging wastes about 1/3 of energy used.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Swhat I'm saying! Like, adding this many charging stations is both necessary and wasteful. We need a better solution in general.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I think it would be much cheaper if there was a universal standard for car batteries that could then be replaced for charged ones at charging stations

[–] rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I'd love to have an electric car, but yeah, shortage of charging stations in the USA and also they're more expensive. Though what I'm paying in gasoline would offset that an amount. Also cheaper maintenance (other than replacing the battery). No problem for me on daily driving range, but doing a long trip with one would require some planning.

[–] Chipthemonk@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From what I understand, the car will help you plan your trip with charging stations along the way. At least, that’s what Teslas do.

[–] rolaulten@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even if you don't have a Tesla there are a handful of apps out there that will help.

Now if we could get everyone on the same stupid plug - but thats a different conversation.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] FantasticFox@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess it will be great in the wealthier countries. Here in Spain the reason EV's are incredibly rare is simply the cost.

And rather than making them more affordable the Government just makes ICE vehicles more expensive to use, which is almost a regressive tax on those too poor to afford an EV. Especially given in many areas it's not really optional given public transport may be unreliable or non-existent.

[–] orrk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you could elect people who will expand public transport... we did it, went from 4 buses a day to an hourly schedule, middle Mosel region Germany, come by our wine is better =P

[–] FantasticFox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I lived in Germany for some months in University.

The trains there are amazing, it really feels like you can get just about anywhere by train. In Spain, we have good connections between major cities but you can't really use them to go on day-trips to places like the castles or the salt mines or whatever.

[–] bigkix@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Where will solar panels and wind turbines for powering those chargers be located at?

[–] Chipthemonk@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Nuclear a power, when done right, is highly efficient.

[–] sirjash@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not in Bavaria, that's for sure!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DrinkBoba@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Another good move EU!!

load more comments
view more: next ›