this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
596 points (99.0% liked)

Programming

17374 readers
253 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Stack Overflow has seen a substantial decline in traffic over the last year that appears to be accelerating. https://observablehq.com/@ayhanfuat/the-fall-of-stack-overflow

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] holycrap@lemm.ee 186 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think this has as much to do with Google being shit at finding stuff lately as it does llms like chatGPT

[–] Calyhre@lemmy.world 102 points 1 year ago (9 children)

You can even see the decline in posts and votes before GPT became mainstream. This definitely look more like search engine failing to get rid of those cheap copycats.

[–] zatanas@lemm.ee 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Agreed. For me, making it so that the search engine ignores -string was one of the biggest set backs.

[–] REdOG@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (4 children)

the search engine ignores -string

WHAT? Why would they do that? WTF no wonder....

[–] gosling@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hyphen (-) means you don't want to see this word, while words surrounded by quotes (") means you want these phrases exactly.

Most symbols are also ignored, which is great for an average user but terrible for programmers.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] raltoid@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Don't forget that Duck Duck Go is even worse at it now. It will literally change your results if you go back after clicking a link.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] danhab99@programming.dev 101 points 1 year ago (9 children)

IDK what shitoverflow gets out of being so fucking toxic. I asked one dumb question and I'm basically banned from posting on the website.

It feels like they're trying to be a sort of "wikipedia" of every programming problem and solution. The problem is that eventually everything will be posted, and everyone will be banned from the website.

[–] bh11235@infosec.pub 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You lack vision, but I see a place where people get blocked and their questions opened then immediately closed as duplicates. Opened and closed, opened and closed all day, all night. Soon, where the internet once stood will be a string of condescending experts, admonitions that "you shouldn't do that, do Y instead", pleas for information closed as off-topic. Passive aggression, spiteful ego contests and wonderful, wonderful karma meters reaching as far as the eye can see. My God, it'll be beautiful.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago (6 children)

"you shouldn't do that, do Y instead"

That's one of my favorites: ignore the problem, only pick on the scope we can't change.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MBM@lemmings.world 22 points 1 year ago

The problem is that eventually everything will be posted, and everyone will be banned from the website.

I don't think they see that as a problem, that's the goal

[–] astral_avocado@programming.dev 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You were able to post on there at all? Don't they have extremely high barriers to entry for even question comments?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rmam@programming.dev 13 points 1 year ago

It feels like they’re trying to be a sort of “wikipedia” of every programming problem and solution.

It looks to me that they could effectively address that by improving their search combined with question grooming, and not shutting down posters.

I mean, what's a naive poster asking dumb questions other than a new user wanting to contribute? Is this the people they want to insult away?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ericjmorey@programming.dev 97 points 1 year ago (14 children)

I bet this is directly related to ChatGPT

[–] SuperFola@programming.dev 40 points 1 year ago (9 children)

People prefer having something generating shitty code and not checking it, instead of asking or searching on internet for a substantially better solution

[–] li10@feddit.uk 65 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Because forum posts are always full of accurate and helpful information?

In my experience it still makes good suggestions for most things, and is better than trying to phrase things in a way that Google likes, then trawling through irrelevant forum posts.

It’s only there to make suggestions, so if someone is taking its output without understanding and treating it like gospel then they’re an idiot who’s inevitably going to end up in a world of trouble.

If you take the suggestion, verify it with documentation, then make sure you actually understand it, chatGPT is a great tool.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 24 points 1 year ago

If I'm honest, stackoverflow was always a shortcut for searching documentation to me.

Simple stuff like how do I turn an InputStream to a String again? I can't remember it, but I know exactly what to look for, I'm just to lazy.

For that kind of stuff ChatGPT is almost perfect.

[–] wren@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because forum posts are always full of accurate and helpful information?

Not necessarily, but at least there's much more opportunity for other people to jump in and correct false info or expand upon something. It's by no means a flawless system, but it's better than only have one source of information

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] gosling@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

You mean shitty code which you can just check and ask them to change in almost real time, over posting your question on SO and waiting for months for an answer?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] harmonea@kbin.social 65 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Most of the comments here seem to be arguing whether it's better to get help now from SO or ChatGPT, but this is a pretty short-sighted mindset.

What happens when the next new standard comes out that ChatGPT hasn't been trained on? If SO tanks and dies, where will you go?

I'm not saying use a lesser resource, I'm saying this is kinda tragic and I hope they can sustain themselves; AI is propped up by human input and can't train itself.

[–] gosling@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Does it really though? It seems to me that once you nail the general intelligence, you'll just need to provide the supplemental information (e.g. new documentations) for it to give an accurate response.

Bing already somewhat does this by connecting their bot to internet searches

[–] gnus_migrate@programming.dev 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We're not able to properly define general intelligence, let alone build something that qualifies as intelligent.

[–] gosling@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can think of four aspects needed to emulate human response: basic knowledge on various topics, logical reasoning, contextual memory, and ability to communicate; and ChatGPT seems to possess all four to a certain degree.

Regardless of what you think is or isn't intelligent, for programming help you just need something to go through tons of text and present the information most likely to help you, maybe modify it a little to fit your context. That doesn't sound too far fetched considering what we have today and how much information are available on the internet

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] gencha@lemm.ee 47 points 1 year ago (6 children)

SO is a shithole, just like Reddit. All the work is done by volunteers. When it was time to cash out with the platform, they also did several things to fuck with their community. I've contributed quite a bit to the trilogy sites, and served as a moderator. I regret every second of it. But at least a few people got rich in the process.

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I don't get why programmers, especially ones actually working on open source projects, insist on using proprietary services. Stack Overflow is one, also GitHub.

[–] pnutzh4x0r@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

It's unfortunate, but the reality is that many of the proprietary services are... free, convenient, and where the people are.

Most projects do not have a lot of funding, so it makes sense to use low cost platforms with the least amount of friction. I think most developers are aware of the risks and trade-offs, but make a pragmatic decision to use these proprietary services b/c the benefits for them outweigh the costs.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Because there are no free and quality alternatives.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] alternativeninja@lemmy.sdf.org 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This doesn't tell us much without also including the quality of the posts. Are we sure this isn't just idiots who ask stupid question that can be found on Google over and over not doing that now that they have chatgpt

[–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Well, for starters, the fall started six months before ChatGPT launched. And there was a brief uptick in traffic after ChatGPT's launch.

For me the real problem with Stack Overflow, as someone who was one of the earliest users of the service, is when you ask a question now you don't actually get a good answer anymore. Often your question just gets deleted by moderators. And even when I've answered someone's perfectly good question, the question (and my answer) have been deleted by mods.

All I can say is thank god ChatGPT came when it did, because we needed something to replace Stack Overflow.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ZombieZookeeper@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Maybe I would post more if I didn't get ignored, or my questions immediately get marked to be closed without comment.

[–] Sl00k@programming.dev 47 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I've had an account for almost 10 years that I use at least every other day at work, and have seen plenty of questions I CAN answer but apparently don't have the "reputation" to.

Honestly a really dumb system imo.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am not sure when this started, but google searches now sort by paid content first rather then relevant content first, so Stack Overflow started to drop down into page 2 or more.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bzxt@lemmy.ml 35 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I really like using code.whatever.social as an alternative frontend to Stack Overflow. It has way less distractions and allows me to only look at the question and the answers and nothing else.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 year ago

I actually go there more often now that I try to avoid reddit in my search results. Sometimes valuable posts have been edited or deleted.

[–] Rooki@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Stack Overflow reached its maximum "duplicates". So new users arent engaged on asking anything because it is of course already a duplicate of xyz.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] canpolat@programming.dev 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] BenLloydPearson@programming.dev 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh wow, thanks. I didn't realize that making this an image post got rid of the link

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

jQuery is also dying. Coincidence?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] witx@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I really hope it burns to the ground. One of the most toxic dev "forums" I've seen. I made a point of never clicking their site when looking for answers even if it took me longer.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] bad_alloc@feddit.de 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is there a fediverse alternative yet?

Also, if you are a technical person I urge you to start a blog where you document problems you solve. It's a great ressource for others and a resumé for you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] poopsmith@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I used to mod on SO and a few SEs, but deleted my accounts a few years back. It's just a mix of low-quality submissions, over-bearing moderators/admins, and bad culture & etiquette. I still regularly use SO when looking up questions, but I haven't participated on there in a long while. I've mostly gone back to smaller forums and mailing lists.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›