this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
167 points (99.4% liked)

196

16461 readers
1760 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] BiNonBi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If he had a choice between being smart or being poor, he would choose to be smart.

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] parlaptie@feddit.de 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds like you made a poor choice.

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago
[–] OrnateLuna@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago

If he had a choice between being smart or being poor, he would choose to be smart.

[–] BiNonBi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago

If he had a choice between good option A or bad option B, he would choose good option A.

[–] Pepperette@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago

A guy found a magic lamp and a Genie popped out and offered him infinite wisdom or infinite wealth. He asks for wisdom, the genie grants it and disappears in a puff of smoke. As the smoke clears the guys says "aw crap, I should have took the money"

Medieval people had the "divine right of kings." Modern people have the "must be brilliant to be that rich" fallacy.

[–] DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Does anyone actually choose to be poor if being smart is the other option? Feels like you'd already have to not be very smart to get the choice wrong.

[–] Lexam@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, but I would speculate most cases would involve those in a religious order or something similar.

[–] DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Even for a religious person, being smart within their company is usually preferred. Priests and the like take great pride in their knowledge of faith and understanding of wisdom. They may take a vow of servitude and condemn themselves to poverty, but they do so with the apparent knowledge they will be rewarded for their sacrifice. That is playing the long game, which takes smarts. "Understanding God's love" and the required knowledge to be a part of a faith, you know?

People prefer to be smart over poor, when those are the only two options

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Drug and alcohol abusers tend to end up with just that double move.

[–] lugal@lemmy.one 10 points 1 year ago

When I was young, I was poor. But after decades of hard work, I'm not young anymore.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Brave choice. Most people would have chosen the lifetime supply of Frisbees.

[–] Andiloor@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

If I were to choose between having a positive quality or having a negative quality, I would have the positive quality

[–] eskimofry@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

I would choose being poor just to avoid being able to read this.

[–] Ambiorickx@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

That makes sense, because then you are smart, and with hard work and dedication, you can become poor as well. But if you choose poverty, there's no amount of hard work and dedication that will increase your intelligence.

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Smarts don't pay the fucking bills.

[–] Dasnap@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 4 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=y5FNoFIfl1Y

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

load more comments
view more: next ›