this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
109 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59314 readers
4719 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It isn't such a good news as it seems at first glance.

So the biggest money grabbing companies are against deep fakes.

But the smaller ones, and the more shady ones aren't. The governments and their 'services'. And the companies who sell to them, and and...

[–] lasagna@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This brings us back to the regulatory issues. If we over regulate western AI, AI from countries like China will gain an edge. And China gives 0 fucks about our laws.

That's not to say I'm against regulation. I think letting them loose could lead to disaster. Coming up with a solution for this is something I think our governments are incapable of and I'm glad it's not my job.

[–] snake_case@feddit.uk 12 points 1 year ago

It's good that the pixel 6 came with a magic eraser then I guess

[–] dreadedsemi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The cat is out. You can't stop it. It's open source. I think the more fakes out there might desensitize people and make them less inclined to believe anything. Though my experience on Facebook isn't encouraging.

[–] ayyndrew@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah I think people* will come to understand that not all images are real, just like they came to understand the not all headlines are real

*some people

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We need something to verify that media is what it claims to be. Will CCTV footage be admissable in court in the future? Maybe we should be looking into NFTs or the like to verify real recordings.

[–] excel@lemmy.megumin.org 2 points 1 year ago

This sounds like a job for digital signatures using traditional certificate authority infrastructure, which has been around for decades. Think digitally signed emails or software installers… Seems like NFTs made society collectively forget about every other form of encryption.

Also keep in mind that you can only ever verify the source, not the truthfulness of the data (e.g. you can prove that the image was created by New York Times and hasn’t been altered since then, but you will never be able to prove that NYT themselves didn’t fake it in some way). Verifying the source is obviously still useful though, so it seems dumb that digital signatures aren’t more ubiquitous.

My guess is that they’ve been resisted for privacy reasons.

[–] masonlee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Here some big names are working on a standard for chaining digital signatures on media files: https://c2pa.org.

Their idea is that the first signature would come from the camera sensor itself, and every further modification adds to the signature chain.

load more comments
view more: next ›