Privacy

31882 readers

502 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Mozilla is recuiting for an AI-powered recommendation engine (www.mozilla.org)

submitted 1 year ago by mark@programming.dev to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm a dev and I was browsing Mozilla's careers page and came across this. I find a privacy respecting company being interested in building an AI powered recommendation engine a little odd. Wouldn't they need to sift through the very data we want private in order for a recommendation engine to be good? Curious of what others think.

top 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] fiat_lux@kbin.social 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mozilla has a huge amount of information already submitted by volunteers to train their own specific-subject LLM.

And as we saw from Meta's nearly ethical-consideration-devoid CM3Leon (no i will not pronounce it "Chameleon") paper, you don't need a huge dataset to train if you supplement with your own preconfigured biases. For better or worse.

Just because something is "AI-powered" doesn't mean the training datasets have to be acquired without ethics. Even if there is something to be said for making material public and the inevitable consequences it can be used.

I hope whoever gets the job can help pave the way for ethics standards in AI research.

[–] mark@programming.dev -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ironically, this comment reads just like an AI wrote it.

[–] fiat_lux@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

The irony of AI-generated responses being difficult to distinguish from the rules educators harassed me to comply with is something I've found pretty amusing lately. It's a bias built into the system, but has the opposite unintended effect of delegitimising actual human opinions. What an own-goal for civilisation.

I am regrettably all too human. I have even been issued hardware keys to prove it!

[–] trent@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Interesting, but probably harmless if it's one-shot. In general, it seems like a bad idea. Not any better or worse than other recommendations systems. Mozilla should look into FHE.

[–] Charliebeans@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

AI topic is getting crazy, just got a request at work to investigate and figure out how AI can could be used at our own company. Not that there's real need, just to be sure...

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

AI is probably at least smarter than the person who sent that request.

[–] pabloscloud@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I don't think it's odd. They can use data, that they already have and make us of it.

[–] drdiddlybadger@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago

Yeeeeeah this is a little sus. AI is more about surveillance than actually providing a service but let them cook I guess? Maybe they're just following the marketing trends and the trends say put AI somewhere in your ad copy to get people to look at you. Just another buzzword...I hope.