this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
430 points (95.9% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35446 readers
712 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 99 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Usernameblankface@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

This is perfect for the situation above

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 54 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Why, I'm missing some reference here?

[–] twobeeornottwobee@lemmy.world 144 points 1 year ago

My first guess was the hood is up to block the dash cam

[–] johnthebeboptist@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago

They're blocking the dashcam or something? I think.

[–] _wintermute@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe it gives them more cover when they're putting mag after mag into an unarmed black guy who is running away?

[–] Blamemeta@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

About 4(? Mightve been 5) years ago, some cops lifted their hoods and planted some drugs. (Or at least was the claim.)

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And then the case was thrown in the court because there was no logic reason to keep both hoods open during a search, right? .....

[–] MrNemobody@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Don't they have body cams?

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago (2 children)

7 states require them right now. Thats it. Most are still fighting saying that if the police are on camera they can't do their job.

[–] cogman@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's not a perfect solution either. There have been plenty of instances where cops "forget to turn on" or "accidently block" their cams. Even cases where, mysteriously, the cams are "accidentally" damaged or the data "corrupted".

Unfortunately seems like the only defense for these cases is livestreaming police interactions.

Cop unions should be illegal. (All other unions are fine)

[–] tentphone@lemmy.fmhy.ml 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Requirements for officers to wear body cameras are meaningless without significant penalties for turning them off when on duty

[–] SirNuke@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Absolutely, and you can generalize that to any sort of requirements are worthless if they don't have as much teeth as the power they are trying to check.

[–] tox_solid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Well, when your job is to menace the communities you are supposedly charged with protecting, all that extra attention can really be a bother.

[–] MostlyBirds@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Rarely, yes, but the technology to create a body cam that functions reliably when near police officers hasn't been developed yet.

[–] dismalnow@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Current models waste space, weight, and durability by including an "off" button.

[–] knatsch@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

You mean the broken once or those with empty batteries?

[–] Polydextrous@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

“Mildly?”