Selfhosted

40041 readers

687 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

Slow sab tips? (lemmy.world)

submitted 11 months ago by tabularasa@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I recently moved from a non docker ubuntu 18.04 setup to a full docker 22.04 setup. I used to get a pretty consistent 95-105 MB/s in sab. I can't seem to get more than 70 MB/s in my new setup. Both my usenet providers are setup the same and using 50 connections. I'd love to blame docker, but thought i see if anyone here has seen this as well. Any suggestions on what to look at?

all 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] plague_sapiens@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

This could be the I/O overhead caused by docker while using NAT networking: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21889053/what-is-the-runtime-performance-cost-of-a-docker-container#26149994

[–] tabularasa@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's a large penalty, wow.

[–] plague_sapiens@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's huge for networking. VPN gateway (for accessing the VPN WAN over LAN) on the host is 20-40% faster than dockerized...

[–] tabularasa@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I'm using NAT for sure. All my containers are on a different subnet than the host.

[–] Lem453@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

The article your linked is citing a paper from 2014. Seems hard the believe the network stack hasn't been significantly reworked in 10 years. That being said I don't have anything to refute this.

Does the above still apply if using a glutun VPN docker with other containers connecting directly to glutun?

[–] seang96@spgrn.com 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

One thing I found when testing.my settings was reducing the number of connections can cause better results. Is the speed your getting through the test button or actual downloads? The test also tests other things for the bottleneck so maybe something else is being the bottleneck like disk speeds.

[–] tabularasa@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Actual downloads going to the same storage array as the previous system. Same NFS lun even. I'll try the test button and playing with the number of connections. Thanks! Will report back.