39
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

The Amiga version is... weird. I mean, yes, the graphics are more detailed than the NES version (but they don't compare to the X68000 extension of the Castlevania series), but it's janky and weird and the final form of Dracula looks like a demonic Richard Simmons.

[-] Dawkinsisgod@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Why the name change on the last port?

[-] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The last game isn’t Castlevania, it’s a game developed at the same time under the same roof as Castlevania for NES. The MSX2 game shares graphics and themes but is intended to be a different game with different gameplay focused more on exploration.

[-] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The PC port on PC speaker sounds terrible, did it predate Adlib? It would otherwise be acceptable as a PC game if I pretend it’s not trying to be Castlevania.

The MSX2 game that was co-developed alongside the NES Castlevania is kind of cool. Not a port, was released at the same time and shares graphics assets but with more exploration focus. I wonder what the control was like—never tried out MSX before.

this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
39 points (95.3% liked)

RetroGaming

19131 readers
215 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS