this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
502 points (94.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

9789 readers
6 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It’s an older article, but the point stands!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Really depends for a motorcycle. I'd rather one over long distance highway than a car, but rather a car over short distance urban routes.

[–] theyouttogetme@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I may just be dumb.

But are you trying to say, you'd rather use a motorcycle for long distance and a car for short distance?

As someone who rides, that's like the super opposite of what I do.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Depends on the bike, I think. Most cars on the road today are well-suited enough for both short and long distance travel. While there are surely some motorcycles that are good for both, there are a much higher proprotion that are better for a specific type of riding, to the relative exclusion of others - whether that be for reasons of ergonomics, curb weight, cargo capacity, handling and suspension comfort, etc.

[–] theyouttogetme@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I think the number of bikes you'd want and be comfortable on taking long distance is a hand full.

Where as cars you would not want for long distance are a hand full.

Realistically the only rational reason to take a bike long distances is because you want to and enjoy it. Outside of that it's just downsides.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

On an ADV? Hell yeah. On a street-sports? Hell no.

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I dunno. Highway hypnosis is much more likely on well, a highway. Folks will be paying a lot less attention in that scenario. Hell, even you will likely be paying a lot less attention. It's just how humans work. Monotony breeds complacency. I understand your reasoning for think the motorcycle is safer on the highway than in a heavily traffic urban area. But I do not understand why you think it's safer than the car on a highway.

[–] RippleEffect@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Especially compared against new cars with adaptive cruise that can and will stop automatically.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's very easy to retain a safe zone and avoid bullshit riding on a highway. The worst that happens is people trying to merge into you, but it's not at all bad because it's very easy to just keep space alongside or power out ahead. Riding on the highway is very pleasurable. It can be a lot more stressful in the car, especially as traffic thickens.

Speed is a much higher contributor to motorcycle casualties, but getting slammed into on blind corners, intersections, etc on normal roads is where most of the shit happens. Riding of highways in bad traffic can physically/mentally exhaust me because I'm frequently very tense and alert.

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't understand why it's more stressful in a car than a motorcycle, especially as traffic thickens as that would make the situation more dangerous. Like, are you saying you wouldn't be tense and alert on a motorcycle in bad traffic on a highway?

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because, in a car, it's a lot harder to get out of shit going down on the highway. Pile ups, blind merges, etc. On a bike it's easy to give yourself all the space and time to evade and keep going while carnage ensues in the mirrors. Most of the time you just use the shoulder to go around or pull up safely away from it all. Bikes are real easy to do evasive maneuvers on, whereas trying in a car usually results in people spinning or going sideways. You don't often emergency brake riding on a highway, it's usually just going to where the cars aren't fucking up and powering away if needed. Still stop though just in case something had happened or need to share helmet cam footage.

In my country, the majority of motorcycle casualties not involving the rider being at fault, are intersections and motorists failing to give way. Almost all over highway speed are single-vehicle, so just the motorcyclist likely being reckless/speeding.

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You keep saying the problematic times for motorcycles are the same problematic times for cars. I mean, there's still no statistic to even back your claim other than a feeling plus a really overly defined and restrictive scenario that doesn't exist in the real world. All highways have merges. And cars can just slam into a motorcycle without warning if they don't see them. It's one of the main causes of accidents.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Don't assume statistics are made up, "feels", or non-existent when someone uses them. My statistics are from a research publication on national motorcycle safety by one of the world's top universities here, though it's not hard to look up the stats which is their base data for the publication. Which is why I also did that with publicly released statistics and insights from a state government's road department—which obviously say the same tjing, but always go with two sources just in case. I only bothered to do that to load on top of my aforementioned experience as a long-distance rider and driver, but obviously it's silly to just go with that if I want to avoid some idiot online, because my own 12 years riding wouldn't be enough. You'd note I also kept reference to my part of the world as that's where the statistics and my experience are from and I can't speak for every country or state, especially those with outlier regulation that may see statistics that are higher or lower outliers to one of arithmetic means.

And, obviously, it also refutes your outlandish claim that being merged into on a highway is one of the main causes of accidents. To explain how stupid that is to a non-rider is futile. If you are a rider—holy shit that's a concern—stop. You shouldn't be allowed on public roads if cars merging toward you is stressful or challenging. Fuck knows what'll happen when you have to do a U-turn, switch directions counter-steerimg, or deal with compression lock from downgearing way too prematurely—the basics.

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What stats? You didn't provide any. And I was repeating your claim about merging on a highway. You said it was the only real issue. What the fuck is going on?

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yikes. I think we've found your issue. I mean, I won't be surprised if you haven't.

May the luck you've had so far in life continue.

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks for the reminder of why I shouldn't play chess with pigeons. They just knock the pieces off the board and claim they won.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Haha, "Chess".