this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
28 points (100.0% liked)

Formula 1

9070 readers
38 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series

Rules

  1. Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
  2. No gambling, crypto or NFTs
  3. Spoilers are allowed
  4. Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
  5. Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
  6. Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
  7. Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.

Up next

F1 Calendar

2024 Calendar

Location Date
🇺🇸 United States 21-23 Nov
🇶🇦 Qatar 29 Nov-01 Dec
🇦🇪 Abu Dhabi 06-08 Dec

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Photographer@lemmy.world
wes@lemmy.world
bwoah@lemmy.world
28
“Bandwagon” F1 teams prompted collapse of Williams capex push, says Wolff (www.autosport.com)
submitted 1 year ago by bhmnscmm@lemmy.world to c/formula1@lemmy.world
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

I wonder if they could take the average cap ex of say Mercedes, Ferrari and Red Bull over the past 10 years and then work out on a team by team basis how much cap ex allowance over the next X years they're allowed to spend too reach that. So Williams might get the biggest allowance, followed by Haas and Sauber, but teams like McLaren and Aston might not get anywhere near as much. That would obviously be on top of whatever the base expenditure is now.

I know jack shit about finance though so this is probably way off base!