this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
42 points (79.2% liked)

World News

32352 readers
415 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eyy@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In response, the US angrily condemned the move as "actions of aggressors looking to start a nuclear war that will cause the extinction of mankind", and arranged for missile launches off the coast of their neighbouring country.

Oh wait, wrong country...

[–] Pili@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Maybe they would be more on edge if Mexico was doing yearly military exercises with China at the Texas border, simulating an invasion of the US.

Oh wait, wrong country...

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] UFODivebomb@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Northern Command confirmed the combined Chinese and Russian naval patrol, telling the Journal: “Air and maritime assets under our commands conducted operations to assure the defense of the United States and Canada. The patrol remained in international waters and was not considered a threat.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I heard you the first time.

They called it "highly provocative" (i.e. actions of aggressors) and sailed their warboats around as a show of force (basically "arranged for missile launches"). The parallels are pretty damn clear, even if the US's response was obscured with mealy mouthed politicking.

[–] UFODivebomb@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Retired military person called it provocative. Not the military.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

At a certain level "retired" is just for plausible deniability.

[–] UFODivebomb@programming.dev -1 points 1 year ago

Lol. Maybe in authoritarian China. In the US that's just a sound byte of no influence.