this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
305 points (93.4% liked)

Technology

59314 readers
4719 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

'Limitless' energy: how floating solar panels near the equator could power future population hotspots::New research shows densely populated countries in Southeast Asia and West Africa could harvest effectively unlimited energy from solar panels floating on calm tropical seas near the equator.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The quickest way to de-carbonize our grid is nuclear. Meanwhile the US closed Three Mile Island a few years ago and onlined more natural gas in the state and Germany closed several nuclear plants and onlined more coal plants. The anti-nuclear push is fucking stupid.

At least France is building nuclear like crazy. They have one of the most de-carbonized grids on the planet.

[–] hh93@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Building new nuclear capacity takes a lot more time than building wind turbines and solar parks though.

Sure shutting the existing ones off is a bad idea but building new ones isn't the way

Also the building part consumes a lot of CO2, too, so it takes a bit longer than with renewables until your are break even.

I feel like a lot of those pushing for Nuclear don't see how France is relying on neighbouring countries in the summer because of the rivers not carrying enough water or not being cold enough for protest cooling and that factor will only get worse - especially with ACs being absolutely essential in summer in the next 50 years.

Sure keeping a good amount of nuclear for base level is good but especially if you're also doing renewables it's far too inflexible to be good if you have a sunny day with a lot of wind - so you need huge energy storage anyway if you want to completely remove gas and oil and at that point renewables are better in using those than nuclear

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If they perfect this cement battery concept a combination nuclear/solar/wind strategy would be the ideal. Solar/wind as much as possible and nuclear to react to deficit with excess stored into block foundations for all three of the above.