this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
312 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

34838 readers
16 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Any mention of the refresh rate? I didn’t see that in this article and thats usually the downside. Completely fine for books, comics etc but maybe not the best for a computer monitor

[–] Nioxic@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Its not on their website either

It must be ... bad.

Its also 1750 bucks.. lol

It might be more of a proof of concept... It's the first of it's kind, so I'd check back where this tech is a few years down the line

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We can see it refreshing in the video, the "refresh rate" doesn't look much better than an e-reader and the device is very expensive, but it's the first of its kind. Honestly if it was the price of a regular OLED screen of 25" I'd consider buying it to code.

[–] chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net 4 points 1 year ago

Second on if affordable, I’d buy it… and I don’t even code much anymore. For anything that doesn’t need to be rapidly refreshed (I.E just about anything that’s not watching/editing videos or playing games), this will be so much more comfortable for extended use!

It can hit a smooth 30 SPF

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sadly, the technology stagnated for quite some time. This along with the physical nature of how the displays function (moving the pigment particles closer and further from the viewing plane) makes high refresh rates unlikely.

[–] You999@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You can kinda cheat and get the refresh rate down to 300ms with partial refresh but that's still one hundred times slower than a 30hz conventional display.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

There's a video in the article that made it look reasonable for office work.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The video has some brief glimpses of scrolling. You're not gonna want to watch video on this thing.

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

I love how she's watching YouTube in the thumbnail, doesn't make any sense on an e ink display?