this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
439 points (96.2% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

3518 readers
45 users here now

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Serinus@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the fur suit is the equivalent [of] leather and a ballgag

I mean, no. It's really not.

I do get what you're saying and generally agree otherwise. That one was just a bit much.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree. I’ve seen furries in public and while I find them odd, I never saw any of their costumes as inherently sexual.

[–] BaroqueInMind@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They do, though, and therein lies the non-issue.

[–] Azal@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Some do, many don't. A fursuit is a costume, as a cosplayer in fandoms do, and I guarantee there are cosplayers that have sex in their costumes.

Knowing quite a few fursuiters there's less of them that want to have sex in suit because it's hot as fuck, makes you a lot more clumsy, and those suits are expensive as hell as they're custom made.

[–] yuriy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

except they don’t though, where are you coming up with this?

say someone is attracted to women, right? is every female body they see gonna be viewed exclusively through a sexual lens?

some people get kinky with ropes, are those inherently sexual too? where’s the line?