Privacy

32130 readers

492 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

2740

So, Neuralink got FDA approval for human trials, and a certain fanbase is VERY excited about that (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by abieNathanTheyThem@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

281 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Commodification of everything you think off Past/Present/Future.

https://fosstodon.org/@jimsalter/110441094176772187

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] crow@beehaw.org 69 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I’m not putting anything in me that’s not foss. I worry for the tech illiterate though when they eventually adopt this idea.

[–] abraxas@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago

I agree, I love the idea of a brain chip, but not if someone can change licensing terms on something that's INSTALLED in me.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Are you going to be that picky when they're fitting you with a pacemaker?

I agree if it's just something for fun though, although personally I'd err on the side of not putting anything in me at all thanks very much. I'm quite happy with my tech on the outside where it belongs.

[–] nottheengineer@feddit.de 23 points 1 year ago

Pacemakers don't have software, they just have firmware. They don't get any updates and don't have to, so this is a non-issue with them.

[–] original_ish_name@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you going to be that picky when they're fitting you with a pacemaker?

Yes.

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

Liberty or death

[–] worfamerryman@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Dude, look at the current support for audio drivers. Do you really want to deal with that for your ears?

Just kidding I don’t know anything about audio drivers 😂

[–] Spiracle@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I remember having to figure out why audio was not working on a new installation. That was once, probably ~5 years ago and was fixed quickly once I found a solution online.

I’d vastly prefer my ears to stop working intermittently due to a FOSS driver issue over a corporate overlord installing bloat, spyware, demanding regular payment for the privilege of them not deleting my driver, just to drop support for them some years later anyway.

[–] programmer_belch@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago

If the audio doesn't work, I want to be sure it is because of me, not some tech-suit trying to make me pay more for their rubbish services

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

What's wrong? It's time to repair your brain's Pulseaudio configuration after an update!