this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
930 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

69346 readers
3877 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

From their own internal metrics, tech giants have long known what independent research now continuously validates: that the content that is most likely to go viral is that which induces strong feelings such as outrage and disgust, regardless of its underlying veracity. Moreover, they also know that such content is heavily engaged with and most profitable. Far from acting against false, harmful content, they placed profits above its staggering—and damaging—social impact to implicitly encourage it while downplaying the massive costs.

Social media titans embrace essentially the same hypocrisy the tobacco industry embodied when they feigned concern over harm reduction while covertly pushing their product ever more aggressively. With the reelection of Trump, our tech giants now no longer even pretend to care.

Engagement is their business model, and doubt about the harms they cause is their product. Tobacco executives, and their bought-off scientists, once proclaimed uncertainty over links between cigarettes and lung cancer. Zuckerberg has likewise testified to Congress, “The existing body of scientific work has not shown a causal link between using social media and young people having worse mental health, ” even while studies find self-harm, eating disorder and misogynistic material spreads on these platform unimpeded. This equivocation echoes protestations of tobacco companies that there was no causal evidence of smoking harms, even as incontrovertible evidence to the contrary rapidly amassed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dwazou@lemm.ee 18 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (4 children)

Getting a dumbphone was one of the best decisions I took in my life. It helps me focus better and read books. I don't actually need the internet with me 24/7. If you really need me, you can call.

Try it. Some people will call you crazy. Just ignore them.

[–] themagzuz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

i'm curious, what exactly is the advantage of getting a dumbphone vs just uninstalling social media apps from your existing phone, or just disabling internet access all together? doesn't that achieve pretty much the same thing while still being able to keep things like navigation and being able to see when public transport is delayed

[–] 46_and_2@lemmy.world 1 points 55 minutes ago

It's like quitting cold turkey - removes the temptation to use these apps.

[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I got an e-ink e-reader in the pocketable form factor of a phone (Bigme Hibreak Color). Instead of doomscrolling social media, I read a couple paragraphs of the Oppenheimer biography. Next I’ll reread Neuromancer. It’s life-changing. 10/10 highly recommended.

[–] Waphles@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Cool! What made you chose that over something like the boox that is the same form factor but without phone functionality?

[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Color screen and the fact that Onyx, the makers of Boox, flagrantly violate GPL terms.

But it was the Boox Palma getting publicity that made me aware of the form factor and start digging. I’m super happy with the Bigme Hibreak, but I don’t have a SIM card in it. I mostly use it in airplane mode as a dumb e-reader and don’t even install any apps besides the minimum needed to do that.

[–] Waphles@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Ah ok, so do you carry a smartphone as well? I wonder what it would be like to completely rely on the bigme

[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

I do. It’s not ideal but it still gives me something better to do than social media.

I’ve heard it’s quirky and kinda mid as a phone, but not unusable.

[–] Tregetour@lemdro.id 5 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

People tend to interact with technology on a default permit basis, which is partly why they have weather-vane attention spans and obliterated focusing capacity. They're like Pavlov's dog, responding to every notification and ping and service update; and social media is treated as the default use state until something else yells for their attention.

I have notifications denied by default. Notifications are lame and a known privacy threat. No one needs to be bothered because someone responded in a group chat or a new post surfaced on a Lemmy comm or a 'deal alert' got pushed by some marketing dipshit on the other side of the planet. That they exist at all for email is ludicrous. Email is an asychronous protocol - delayed responses are a feature.

Stop giving this stuff attention on demand and start allocating attention windows where it will get seen to. Email that gets in front of your eyes is 99 per cent transaction stubs if you're doing it right; there is no more reason to pay it any attention outside 7pm for 10 or 15 minutes (say). Similar treatment should apply to most messaging to be honest.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

ok but like if I don't have music and noise cancelling earbuds I will explode

[–] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (2 children)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 1 points 5 hours ago

I would like wired earphones to make a comeback, though that wouldn't stop certain assholes from watching stuff/listening to music without them on the bus with max volume

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago

I mean you could walk around with an IPod, but that's basically a phone anyway.