this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
366 points (98.7% liked)

Science Memes

14345 readers
4310 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chakravanti@monero.town -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

He's not being snarky about it or the numbers. He's being snarky about someone else that's much like that but much more ridiculous and on TV. Somewhat entertaining because he's completely wrong about gorram near everything. It's about to go completely psychotic when, although, in all fairness, if, the cult followers become aware of the truth. Otherwise they are sociopaths.

Kind of point to be snarky here where we can point at the truth. Has little or nothing to do with the numbers, per se...

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Was that supposed to be coherent or relevant? Are you lost?

[–] Chakravanti@monero.town 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It is coherent but if you're going to be snarky about it because you just don't get it, with an ego that whines all kinds of sensitivity and shit in public, then I'm just not going to explain that shit to you. I mean, Why would I? My ego has dope. So fuck off kid.

...or just ask the question all polite and shit and don't forget the apology.