this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
58 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

37702 readers
352 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] allywilson@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm just impressed the UK can even be in the top 10.

[–] PennyRoyal@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I reckon we’d be doing even better if it was total renewables, we lean toward wind power more than most, what with being an island and all

[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That would put you in competition with places like canada, that are 76% renewables though, if you count hydro.

For wind alone (according to wikipedia) you do do better, but are still in 6th place.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You'd also have to count all the oil and gas that Canada exports to be burned around the world. Whether it's used domestically or not doesn't really make a difference.

[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

true, but then you'd have to do the same with every other country that sells oil, which would skew the numbers a bunch

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Of course, that's the only proper way to track this.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Data should be per capita or another relative measure.

[–] Faceman2K23@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

If you want it Per Capita, try this one with data from 2023.

Pretty different story naturally.

(edited link to include the same countries as the op post)

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

But still, China is going full power on renewables, eventually they will pull ahead there as well, unless west or others start investing in renewables seriously.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

Indeed that paints a different picture as suggested.

[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 days ago

Yes, solar per capita, or percentage of solar in total energy production.