this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
253 points (97.0% liked)

Science Memes

14312 readers
2381 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thawed_caveman@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The first part of the equation seems to make sense, the number of eggs does depend on the number of children, age of the children, and size of the eggs. Makes sense that each of the kids gets two eggs. Not sure why it's the square root of y, but okay.

The (a+d) part i just don't understand at all. Why are the physical properties of the garden relevant?

And yeah, as the other commenter pointed out, i wonder what units they're even using for some of this data

[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Area would help account for a really large yard, where you may want more eggs, or for a small one, where this calculation simply has too many eggs. So, egg density per square foot (or whatever unit they wanted).

Undergrowth size to me seems like its accounting for how many eggs simply aren't found. If the grass is 6" long, you'll want more eggs because they'll not all be found.

This seems to fit especially because they're added together, which means even a yard that was just dirt, no undergrowth, you'd get eggs from area alone. There's a floor on it. If it were a separate multiple then no grass would mean no eggs.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Most of those seem like nonlinear relationships, so it still doesn't make any sense still. The undergrowth would only start becoming an issue when the height gets taller than the egg diameter.

[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

I agree, but that seems like about the level of detail a formula with no units would have.