this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2025
62 points (84.4% liked)

Technology

69156 readers
3676 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Other differentiated opinions wanted:

A friend showed me this and treats it like a prophecy. I'm rather skeptical. To me seems like somebody tries to fuel the AI hype with this text or is completely drunk with AI. It also fuels the China-US who-is-better-fight and the authors thoughts seem to circle too much around the US president, IMO.

But I don't understand much of this machine-learning stuff. So maybe it's me being ignorant. Still, to me reads like science fiction. How about you?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FourWaveforms@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In 2025, AIs function more like employees. Coding AIs increasingly look like autonomous agents rather than mere assistants: taking instructions via Slack or Teams and making substantial code changes on their own, sometimes saving hours or even days.

They already lost me, not even a minute in.

It's still a graphing calculator. It still sucks at writing code. It still breaks things when it modifies its own code. It's still terrible at writing unit tests, and any programmer who'd let it write substantial production and test code is like a lawyer who'd send the front desk attendant to argue in court.

It also has no idea about office politics, individual personalities, corporate pathology, or anything else a human programmer realistically has to know. Partly because it has anterograde amnesia.

So, since the authors screwed that up, my guess is the rest of the article is equally useless and maybe worse.