this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
133 points (92.4% liked)

Uplifting News

14716 readers
1087 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In an experiment, one tube produced 440 microwatts. When the researchers used four tubes at once, they could power 12 LEDs for 20 seconds.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Unless you are harnessing a box store, factory or warehouse roof you aren't going to have the throughput to generate any really useful amount of energy. Also hydro works best where there is constant flow. So sewers would be a better place if you could solve the solids issue.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] FoolishAchilles@lemm.ee 5 points 6 days ago

There are many keepers of the poop knife lore, but none so innovative as you my friend. Get this person a promotion!

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

Brand new sentence.

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

I like the way you think!

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago

Yeah but think of how many LEDs you could light for 20 seconds once a week if you spent thousands filling your roof with these!

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

box store, factory or warehouse roof

But isn't that exactly the sort of implementation we're talking about here? Especially if you deploy this in large farms around the watershed. One problem with dams is that they have limited potential energy, since you can't really build a hydroelectric dam in the sky. Harnessing additional kinetic energy for free on its way to the reservoir, capturing energy that otherwise would've just gone into the "plop" sound on the dirt, seems like a reasonably good idea; especially if it's cheap.

Of course, there's no way it's ever going to rival solar or wind (or true hydroelectric). But I hope we learned our lesson long ago to not put all of our energy eggs in one basket.

EDIT: Nah, you're right, on a large scale this is unlikely to be able to pay its own manufacturing costs. Perhaps this is more useful as a small-scale energy source.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This isn't a terrible idea, and it could be useful as a source of emergency power in places that have high rainfall (paired with a battery system). From my background, I just don't see it as viable for general use.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I also wonder about stacking them, particularly in places with a lot of rainfall.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Somewhere that has lots of drop, sure. But hydro relies on head pressure. Which is why most dams are a resevoir with multiple turbines.