this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
1485 points (95.8% liked)

memes

14362 readers
3351 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not that I disagree with you on how idiotic it is, but with AI you can give it very precise requirements on what you want to see.

There are people who would pay to have porn videos created to their taste. User fuckswithducks on reddit explained this a few years ago. Now people who have such extremely specific desires don't have to shell out thousands for a private video from their favorite star.

[–] figjam@midwest.social 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not that I disagree with you on how idiotic it is, but with AI you can give it very precise requirements on what you want to see.

Which brings up ethical issues that the techbros seem to handwave away.

[–] DontMakeMoreBabies@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What's more ethical - paying someone to record and rape a duck, or making a computer play pretend?

[–] sjmarf@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

To be clear, u/fuckswithducks had a rubber duck fetish, so no actual ducks were involved in that specific case. Though I get your point.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

with AI you can give it very precise requirements on what you want to see

Setting aside the fact that you could do this already with a sufficiently well-tagged library of traditional pornography, you're neglecting two big caveats

  1. People's porn tastes are so rarified that they need exacting specifications in order to enjoy it

  2. AI consistently and faithfully delivers on queries, rather than pumping out a bunch of vague approximations full of uncanny valley graphical artifacts

There are people who would pay to have porn videos created to their taste.

And they can already do that with Cam Girls, for infinitesimally less than it costs to run a high end AI model.

Now people who have such extremely specific desires don’t have to shell out thousands for a private video from their favorite star.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veblen_good

The high price is what makes the luxury good appealing. If everyone can get it, then it isn't what a handful of high rollers are after.

The real "money in AI porn" isn't reshuffled budget-tier bulk content. It's the promise of exclusive ultra-high-end luxury taboo. And the end of that road is just the porn version of Star Citizen. Someone who has baited a bunch of 4chan stogies with more money than sense into putting up $40k for the opportunity to have a five-way with Leia Oregon, Jessica Rabbit, and Rhea Ripley in six months to a year, once we've tuned the prompt just right.

But that's not any kind of industry. It's just scams.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

The running cost of the AI model is shared between users. cam girl donations - technically also, but if too many people donate, you get less attention personally.

Personally I'm just going to keep on watching free porn. The gambling ads at least pay out to real people instead of fossil fuel companies.