this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2025
2194 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

68130 readers
3551 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They exchanged messages just before the subreddit r/WhitePeopleofTwitter was given a temporary ban for 72 hours

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] r0x0r@discuss.tchncs.de 118 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Is this the "free speech" everyone in 'Murica is talking 'bout?

[–] AVengefulAxolotl@lemmy.world 40 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Musk bought twitter because he wanted free speech...

Ironic huh

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 29 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Nah, he wanted to modify what was being said. He blocked and oppressed views he didn't like. It was never free speech. It was always oppression.

[–] cortex7979@lemm.ee 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't even think he new the possibilities of what he can do with Twitter before he bought it. He bought it and after that he needed something to do with this shit pile and found the solution in manipulation and illegal election donation

[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemm.ee 4 points 4 days ago

I think he had to enter into agreements about content in order to get financing from the Saudis and Russians.

[–] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Musk bought Twitter because he fucked around trying to manipulate the stock price and accidentally made an agreement he couldn't back out of. He tried. He failed. He was forced to buy it according to the terms he previously specified.

[–] singletona@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I hate my conspiricy theory minded family but if someone told me they had proof Musk expressly bought Twitter to get right wing power in America and used the buyer's remorse stock price manipulation attempt gone south as a cover story?

I'd believe it.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago
  1. He's dumber than you give him credit for
  2. What is the point of the supposed cover story? To cover from who, about what? He's literally paying people to vote, again. Next to that, buying a social media to influence it almost sounds democratic.

The reason that conspiracy theory is appealing is the same for all conspiracy theories; it's more comforting to think the powerful have a clever masterful evil plan than the sad reality that we're all making it up as we go, even the literal Nazis.

Relevant ContraPoints from 4 days ago

[–] seeigel@feddit.org 2 points 4 days ago

Once you are there, start wondering if Trump is really that mad or if they are implementing an old Nixon plan.

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

He did. Free speech for bigots that is.

Well, wanted to own a mechanism of free speech so he could control it.

[–] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Not ironic when you realize it's this but literally. He wants to own all speech.

[–] iheartneopets@lemm.ee 0 points 4 days ago

Honestly, say something useful or keep it to yourself, OK? These lil 'gotcha' comments do nothing but take up space and make you feel a misplaced sense of having done something (when you've in fact, done nothing).

Stuff like this comment, the mango Mussolini comments, the evil Cheeto comments, it all just fucking does nothing while still making people feel like they're being transgressive. You're not. It diverts energy from doing/talking about stuff that affects real change.