this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
1475 points (98.6% liked)

Science Memes

13469 readers
2485 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frezik@midwest.social 36 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Ethics mean we don't know what the average human male erect penis size is.

No, really. The ethics of the studies say that a researcher can't be in the presence of a sexually aroused erect penis. Having the testee measure their own penis is prone to error. There are ways to induce an erection with an injection, so they use that.

Is the size of an induced erection the same as a sexually aroused erection? Probably in the same ballpark, but we don't really know.

Source: Dr Nicole Prause, neurologist specializing in sexuality, on Holly Randall's podcast.

Having the testee measure their own penis is prone to error.

To be fair, testicles aren't designed for that task.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

A quick trip on Google scholar turns up a lot of studies on the size of male erections.

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/553598c1e4b0a7f854584291/t/55ee4a5ee4b025d99f73150e/1441679966732/Penis+Size+Study+-+Veale+et+al+2015+BJUI.pdf

It is acknowledged that some of the volunteers across different studies may have taken part in a study because they were more confident with their penis size than the general male population.

Ha, poisoned data tho

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Of course it was biased, those numbers are huge on there, it was men confident in their size skewing the data, at least that's what I will tell myself

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure, they exist, but they have the flaws outlined above.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The study I linked seems to include both self stimulated erections and erections due to injection. They also limit themselves to clinical measurements. They mention self measured results but point out that they are unreliable, as you said. They do point out however that there might be a difference between self stimulation and an erection with a partner.

But all in all, there isn't a barrier because of the ethics involved in touching a penis and masturbation.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

a researcher can’t be in the presence of a sexually aroused erect penis

Is this some puritan rule? Plenty don't care to flap their erect penis in the faces of some researchers if they asked nicely. What got ethics to do with it when there is consent?

[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago

It's not a strict rule, sex science is a thing that can be done with ethical review same as other medical research. the commenter im not sure is giving an accurate picture of this topic.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not all erections are sexual-- can't they just measure the non sexy ones?

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

if only we had some sort of medication specifically designed to cause an erection

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

might impact the data, then we'd only know given those constraints

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So wait

Who is telling the truth. My ex said it was too big. The bell curves I've found have said "uh what lmfao no way are you that big" but every self reported study says I'm small

How the fuck am I going to ever find a toilet that is comfortable to use in my own home

[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How the fuck am I going to ever find a toilet that is comfortable to use in my own home

That was an odd segue

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's a problem for men with penises that are long when flaccid. Their penises can touch the inside of the bowl when they're seated unless they hold their penis up.

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago

Never taken an unexpected dip I see?

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Switch from a siphonic toilet bowl to a wash down bowl. You'll get more skid marks, but less dips, splashes and clogging.

[–] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

aren't there literally studies about the size that only accepted measurements by medical professionals?

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 1 day ago

Yes, and they have the problems outlined above.