this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025
1290 points (97.4% liked)

Reddit

19819 readers
2498 users here now

News and Discussions about Reddit

Welcome to !reddit. This is a community for all news and discussions about Reddit.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


Rule 1- No brigading.

**You may not encourage brigading any communities or subreddits in any way. **

YSKs are about self-improvement on how to do things.



Rule 2- No illegal or NSFW or gore content.

**No illegal or NSFW or gore content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-Reddit posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] debaser@lemm.ee 51 points 1 day ago (3 children)

They've also been banning accounts for liking comments about Green Mario doing nothing wrong. It's about the closest thing to thought crime I've ever seen. (PS Green Mario did nothing wrong)

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 33 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I don't mean this as an attack at all, but isn't calling Luigi "Green Mario" a way to comply with the wired reddit cencorship?

We are on Lemmy, you can speak freely here.

Or did something just go over my head?

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also innocent until proven guilty, a lot of people seem to forget that one.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 15 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It's actually pretty likely he's not the guy. While they have a picture of him from a nearby hostel, the picture from cctv at the scene doesn't match quite so well.

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Im agree, but my gripes stem from the timing of how and when they picked him up. Rolling a nat 1 on disquise in a golden arches hundreds of miles away with all the evidence makes me think one of two things. 1) he isnt the guy, the NYPD needed their pound of flesh and just made it all up or 2) they are sure its him, but are unwilling to explain to the press how they know because big brother shit.

In addition, with the mayor not shutting up about the investigation, that perp walk, and the media shrieking "oh no, he's hot", the is no way he is getting an unbiased jury in NYC. (I expect it to be the opposite, but thats the ACAB talking)

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

I don't think NYPD is allowed access to the big brother shit.

[–] arrow74@lemm.ee 8 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I made a comment self censored to "Mario bros" on reddit. Got a permanent ban. They're going scorched earth on anything moderately inflammatory

[–] Bristingr@lemm.ee 2 points 6 hours ago

They might as well just shut down r/Nintendo then.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 1 points 22 hours ago
[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Whether or not they were being ironic, we HAVE to stop capitulating to corporations deciding how we speak and what we can and can't talk about. They successfully turned our own social messaging into a justification to block out conversations about issues that are actually affecting us.

(No, to the chud about to cry about being censored for spreading misinformation about vaccines, that doesn't go against corporate incentives, that goes against reason and knowledge, there's a difference and if you can't tell, you will when you get older.)

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 5 points 23 hours ago

Or, if I might add, in case of anti-vaxxers, IF you get older ;-)

[–] Sibshops@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

Maybe people were actually saying "Green Mario" and not Luigi.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Agreed, you can refer to him by name here lol. Or Saint Luigi if you prefer ;)

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago

He absolutely did something wrong, he got caught.

And I felt his manifesto was not very well written.

[–] Legume5534@lemm.ee -5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

(PS Green Mario did nothing wrong)

He killed a guy. So he did.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

He killed a corpo. So he did nothing wrong.

[–] Legume5534@lemm.ee -3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck the opinions around here are unhinged.

Why did you want that person killed?

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Because he was a murderer and he would kill again if he was allowed to live.

[–] Legume5534@lemm.ee 1 points 9 hours ago (5 children)
[–] newfie@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

The framing for this is that murder is bad; however there are exceptions to that. One such exception is that self defense of oneself or self defense of another provides a (morally and legally) justified basis for murder. If someone is trying to murder you or someone else, and you murder that person to prevent this, then you have engaged in self defense, which is justified.

The argument is that there is insufficent evidence to demonstrate that Luigi was the person who committed the murder at issue. However, even if it can be proved that Luigi did in fact commit this murder, the argument is that it was justified as an act of self defense to protect himself/others from being killed by the decedent's actions. This requires viewing violence as something that is structural and systemic, and not just direct and immediately physical. Under the former approach, Luigi engaged in self defense; under the latter, he did not.

The American legal system generally only recognizes the latter as a valid legal defense. But this is irrelevant to the moral question of whether it was justified; and, even to the legal question, we can ask why our system does not recognize structural violence as criminal violence. The answer to that lies in who writes the laws, or, rather, who pays for the laws to be written. All nations have a ruling class who are the principal beneficiaries of the legal system; the US is no different

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

If you kill someone to prevent that someone from killing millions, it is not.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Is it bad to kill a mass murderer? I say it's not.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago

Killing innocent people is bad.

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 1 points 6 hours ago

Google "Paradox of tolerance".