this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
276 points (96.6% liked)

Linux

6466 readers
657 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

curl https://some-url/ | sh

I see this all over the place nowadays, even in communities that, I would think, should be security conscious. How is that safe? What's stopping the downloaded script from wiping my home directory? If you use this, how can you feel comfortable?

I understand that we have the same problems with the installed application, even if it was downloaded and installed manually. But I feel the bar for making a mistake in a shell script is much lower than in whatever language the main application is written. Don't we have something better than "sh" for this? Something with less power to do harm?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you've downloaded and audited the script, there's no reason to pipe it from curl to sh, just run it. No https necessary.

[–] isaaclw@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The https is to cover the factthat you might have missed something.

I guess I download and skim out of principle, but they might have hidden something in there.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wat. All https does is encrypt the connection when downloading. If you've already downloaded the file to audit it, then it's in your drive, no need to use curl to download it again and then pipe it to sh. Just click the thing.

[–] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, https was for downloading it in the first place. My bad, I didn't get my thoughts out in the right order.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

That makes sense. I probably should have gotten it from context.