this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
202 points (97.6% liked)

Autism

6844 readers
5 users here now

A community for respectful discussion and memes related to autism acceptance. All neurotypes are welcome.

We have created our own instance! Visit Autism Place the following community for more info.

Community:

Values

  • Acceptance
  • Openness
  • Understanding
  • Equality
  • Reciprocity
  • Mutuality
  • Love

Rules

  1. No abusive, derogatory, or offensive post/comments e.g: racism, sexism, religious hatred, homophobia, gatekeeping, trolling.
  2. Posts must be related to autism, off-topic discussions happen in the matrix chat.
  3. Your posts must include a text body. It doesn't have to be long, it just needs to be descriptive.
  4. Do not request donations.
  5. Be respectful in discussions.
  6. Do not post misinformation.
  7. Mark NSFW content accordingly.
  8. Do not promote Autism Speaks.
  9. General Lemmy World rules.

Encouraged

  1. Open acceptance of all autism levels as a respectable neurotype.
  2. Funny memes.
  3. Respectful venting.
  4. Describe posts of pictures/memes using text in the body for our visually impaired users.
  5. Welcoming and accepting attitudes.
  6. Questions regarding autism.
  7. Questions on confusing situations.
  8. Seeking and sharing support.
  9. Engagement in our community's values.
  10. Expressing a difference of opinion without directly insulting another user.
  11. Please report questionable posts and let the mods deal with it. Chat Room
  • We have a chat room! Want to engage in dialogue? Come join us at the community's Matrix Chat.

.

Helpful Resources

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
BackOnMyBS@lemmy.world
202
Standing up for your values might be decided to be a pathology - If you're autistic (neuroclastic.com)
submitted 1 year ago by SuddenDownpour@lemmy.world to c/autism@lemmy.world
47 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This article picks apart a bunch of biases by the researchers of a given paper. The object of study was the differences in behavior between a group of autistic people and a group of non-autistic people when choosing between prioritizing value for oneself or value for the community.

I recommend reading the paper itself too. If that is, understandably, too much for you, I suggest you go for the introduction, the conclusion, and the segments mentioned in the article.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] orrk@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just want to point out that this article also says that autistic people bad for not supporting autism speaks, btw

"This can be seen in autistic people’s stance against ABA for example, which decreases speaking opportunities for autistic advocates."

imagine not supporting abuse, nor an organization that wants to eugenics people with ASD...

[–] SuddenDownpour@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You have misunderstood that line. The line is linking to this tweet, which says:

Wanna know a why many “big” advocates won’t talk about ABA in a bad light?

The ABA lobby is huge. If you are a public speaker in the autism world being antiABA closes a lot of doors.

I have been uninvited to speaking events because of my views on ABA.

No regrets.

Which the article sums up as, as you quote:

This can be seen in autistic people’s stance against ABA for example, which decreases speaking opportunities for autistic advocates.

This is a true statement. If you publicly criticize ABA, certain institutions are going to close their doors for you. The article is saying that autistic people are going to criticize ABA nonetheless when doing so is in line for their values, as the paper suggests, despite the authors wacky interpretations, and I think both the writer, you and I agree that making that criticism of ABA is indeed good.