this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
463 points (96.8% liked)

memes

12236 readers
2323 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mmddmm@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I get the impression that ext4 is more widely supported than exFAT.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 18 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Lol nah, exFAT is the only current FS (other than fat32) capable of being read AND written to by Linux, MacOS and Windows out of the box

[–] mmddmm@lemm.ee 1 points 4 hours ago

It's supported by Linux, Windows, MacOS, and all of the embedded devices with a firmware written by organizations that give a damn.

But somehow, ext4 passes under the radar and gets into nearly every embedded device.

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 5 points 23 hours ago

It certainly should be. And as we're on it, Mainboards should support it too. It's a pain to create special partitions, and sometimes even use MBR instead of GPT, just for a BIOS update.