15
this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
15 points (100.0% liked)
Privacy
1112 readers
829 users here now
Protect your privacy in the digital world
Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.
Rules
PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!
- Be nice, civil and no bigotry/prejudice.
- No tankies/alt-right fascists. The former can be tolerated but the latter are banned.
- Stay on topic.
- Don't promote proprietary software.
- No crypto, blockchain, etc.
- No Xitter links. (only allowed when can't fact check any other way, use xcancel)
- If in doubt, read rule 1
Related communities:
- !opensource@programming.dev
- !selfhosting@slrpnk.net / !selfhosted@lemmy.world
- !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The one good thing I can say about this new Terms of Use document is that it's not ridiculously long.
This language seems excessively broad, like it could be interpreted to allow Firefox to send that information to Mozilla instead of just passing it to the sites we intend to have it. Why else would they need us to grant them a license to it?
Is there a lawyer in the house?
This notion that it's okay to unilaterally change the terms of a license, and impose those changes upon people without explicit agreement, is absurd. Moreover, it is not remotely reasonable to expect people to spend their lives constantly checking the posted licenses of all the software they use to see if any of them has changed.
I am disappointed in Mozilla here.