this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
397 points (97.1% liked)

Privacy

1112 readers
829 users here now

Protect your privacy in the digital world

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be nice, civil and no bigotry/prejudice.
  2. No tankies/alt-right fascists. The former can be tolerated but the latter are banned.
  3. Stay on topic.
  4. Don't promote proprietary software.
  5. No crypto, blockchain, etc.
  6. No Xitter links. (only allowed when can't fact check any other way, use xcancel)
  7. If in doubt, read rule 1

Related communities:

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 

From the new terms:

When you upload or input information through Firefox, you hereby grant us a nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide license to use that information to help you navigate, experience, and interact with online content as you indicate with your use of Firefox.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RejZoR@lemmy.ml 71 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Come on Mozilla, what the fuck are you guys doing? You don't have the luxury of monopoly and you're going to alienate those few diehard fans who stick with Firefox because alternatives are shit and they all run Chromium even if they aren't.

Ladybird needs to materialize fast before it's too late.

I'd go Waterfox, but I really like the on-machine translation in Firefox that Waterfox doesn't have it.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 32 points 2 days ago (3 children)

LibreWolf has the on-machine translation and when you disable some of the hardcore privacy defaults it is a quite good Firefox replacement.

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That's my biggest problem with LibreWolf: the defaults are waay too strict and disable/break so many things

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why are none of these Firefox alternatives in my distro's repository?

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Bad distro? They are in mine 🤷‍♂️

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Well, it's Kubuntu, so yeah, I guess.

But it's a popular bad distro, so that's still a problem for a lot of people.

[–] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Nix, Guix, and Flatpak have Librewolf so you can use one of them

[–] RejZoR@lemmy.ml -5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

But has no mobile version effectively making it useless.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Firefox Desktop doesn't have a mobile version, they just call an entirely separate codebase for the mobile version Firefox as well. If you want a mobile alternative there is Fennec.

[–] socialmedia@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Just use something else on mobile. I use mull (until it becomes insecure because I think they stopped working on it) and fennec.

Fennec supports extensions and syncing so it should be okay for most use cases.

IronFox is a fork of Mull when you decide it's time.

[–] usernameusername@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

please consider switching to ironfox, it's a mull fork

[–] RejZoR@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 days ago

Fennec and Librewolf support logging into a Firefox account and thus sync. However, that obviously partially brings you back to the Mozilla problem...

i think there should be a global switch that enables firefox to send data to third parties, and it should be disabled by default; then firefox would be fine.