this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
199 points (90.6% liked)

World News

32316 readers
587 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mate I don't know if you've ever bothered to watch visits to NK but they're not quite what you seem to think they are. There is a considerable amount of things that people do there, the downside being that they are all supervised.

Like, just watch some? You're perfectly happy to swallow everything from literal propaganda outlets but you're unwilling to actually watch first hand accounts of any visitors? You are only willing to consume things filtered through a media lens? Why?

"These people" have actually visited. You have not. You're not even ALLOWED to visit because your government makes it illegal to. Wtf is up with that? And you're the one that thinks you have more information than people who are not prevented from visiting and making their own minds up first hand?

The only edgelord here is the person that is vehemently calling VOA fair and unbiased while simultaneously calling the first hand accounts of actual real visitors to the country propaganda. You're out of your mind. You're the most propagandised person I have ever had the displeasure of talking to actually.

[–] Veraticus@lib.lgbt -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it’s hilarious you’re scolding me for not considering a badly edited 20 minute video filled with total propaganda and misinformation more canonical than, you know, actual reporting about North Korea and conditions there. Irony is truly dead.

This is just tankie apologia and badly done at that. If you can’t see that you’re blind.

Why don’t you go back to Lemmygrad? Our instance is unfederated with that so we don’t have to run into idiots like you.

[–] Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes I'm quite aware that some instances are full of authoritarians that like to restrict the speech of any political opposition to their left. Actually engaging with any arguments we make ends quite badly for you when you cite the CIA and its propaganda while we cite actual primary sources so you simply take the authoritarian position of eliminating left wing speech instead. An action Mccarthy would be proud of.