332
submitted 1 year ago by Dazza@lemmy.world to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

and he should be considered ~~innocent~~ not guilty.

FTFY. Words have meanings and those meanings are important.

[-] zephyreks@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Innocent until proven guilty is literally the fundamental basis of our justice system. He is innocent by definition.

[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Innocent until proven guilty*

[-] r1veRRR@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

NO! That is how the court system, and therefore the state sees him in regards to punishment and treatment. That does not mean, and has never ever ever ever meant, that being declared not guilty means they are proven to be innocent. Just that there's wasn't evidence beyond a reasonable doubt.

[-] scottywh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

This wasn't a US court... Does that apply on London?

[-] c0m47053@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

Yes, the UK justice system works on the same principle

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
332 points (94.9% liked)

World News

32076 readers
939 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS