this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
394 points (98.0% liked)

Open Source

33279 readers
284 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] logging_strict@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Classic case of coop the resistance by introducing completely different talking points.

FOSS is not left or right, it's FOSS. Those trying to change it to something else is trying to coop it.

There is no controversy. The blue vs red lens does not make sense in this context.

[–] sping@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 week ago

Sharing your work without cost to people who need it is pretty solidly left. But it certainly isn't red vs blue, not least because party political colors vary by country and in the US, neither refers to a left-wing party, and in most countries red aligns with left.

[–] KrasMazov@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

FOSS is political. Sure, there are right wingers in FOSS projects, but the nature of it is leftist.

[–] logging_strict@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

i see it as more of an evolution.

Like patent system, litigious closed source software produced very little and what it did produce did not have funding to be properly maintained

whereas

FOSS fostered peer collaboration improving the entire ecosystem of how to go about producing better software, produced alot, and what it did produce did not see much funding to be properly maintained

Before a political ideology claims victory i insist maintenance be fully funded.

Claiming victory while marching off a cliff is laughable.

No party represents producers. Otherwise H1B visas would not be a thing.