General idea seems to be "keep your glue outside of core subsystems", not "do not create cross-language glue, I will do everything in my power to oppose this".

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This creates a lot of extra work for no benefit, as every driver that needs DMA would have to include their own copy of the DMA stuff.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They still can share code. Just not maintained by dma.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nobody asked for the code to be maintained by DMA. The maintainer blocked a PR outside his subsystem, and even if it was part of his subsystem, the R4L approach is that C developers can break Rust code however they want.

Literally nobody suggested that the DMA maintainers should maintain Rust code.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

Huh.