this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
671 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59314 readers
4719 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
671
Unpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specification (vivaldi.com)
submitted 1 year ago by Techie@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
97 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shalva97@lemmy.sdfeu.org 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sometimes I wonder if people never blocked adds, would websites have less adds?

[–] lazurski@chaos.social 1 points 1 year ago

It would add to adds 🤣 @shalva97 @joe

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I believe there would be the same amount, or possibly more ads, but more targeted and more intrusive.

[–] shalva97@lemmy.sdfeu.org 1 points 1 year ago

But that would make websites with less adds more popular. Maybe it would increase the number of websites that just show enough adds to support their servers... I don't know maybe it will be very small percentage, but at least not 0