1787
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Signtist@lemmy.world 150 points 1 year ago

Did people actually change what they'd say based on whether or not they thought they'd get upvotes? I always just said what I wanted and used the karma to determine how popular of an opinion it was, so pretty much exactly how Lemmy works now. I don't think I ever looked at my overall account karma on Reddit.

[-] STRIKINGdebate2@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes. It can also trick you into thinking a reactionary opinion is actually a popular one. For example in my country, ireland, there's been a few incidents were people of different nationalities have done unsavoury things caught on camera. This usually results of the comment section of the ireland sub to have a debate about whether there's too many immigrants in the country. Whichever side gets more upvotes is widely perceived to have "won" and bystanders will in turn adopt that position.

I don't think I've ever changed an opinion of mine to go along with the hive mind but the karma system has definitely discouraged me from commenting things because I would been downvoted into oblivion. It's not worth getting into arguments when you can clearly see people not siding with you.

[-] Steeve@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 year ago

How does this system solve that? Comments still have vote counts and reactionary comments still make it to the top of threads, there's just no visible count of total aggregated votes.

[-] Hopps@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

You're correct, the entire system is already in place. The only thing that is currently missing is adding up all of someone's 'karma' from their their posts and having it shown on their profile. Some of the apps already have this implemented since it's easy to incorporate.

[-] orphiebaby@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That's not the only thing that's missing. A total upvote count on my profile page wouldn't be the problematic element that Reddit has. I would welcome a total upvote count on my profile page.

[-] ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I'm fine being downvoted to oblivion by some anti-good astrotufing campaign, but it's getting honest, legitimate opinions slid down and out of discussion that feels risky

I'm definitely anti right wing, but that doesn't automatically make the left right about everything.

What is true about both sides is that some people just wanna look for a fight/argument and dehumanize their political 'other'. It's easy dopamine and righteous rage that drives engagement in every human.

Any good faith comment that points this out in an argument and has credible examples is always worth its salt.

I actually like finding out I'm wrong or my information is incomplete/outdated. I don't care for unfounded opinions in myself or others regardless of how they make me feel!

[-] Touching_Grass@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

It did the opposite for me. I see those threads in r/canada or other posts and I'd comment trying to get downvoted because I hated the circle jerking and manipulation of threads with cliché comment chains intent on being dog whistles. I hated karma and somehow ended up with a stupid amount of it.

[-] Lith@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

The big thing for me is that I've seen a lot of people say they've had their accounts stalked and harrassed for saying really mild things. With how many times I've read "I read your post history and..." over even the most mild disagreements, I absolutely believe this happens on a regular basis. Dropping an obviously unpopular opinion feels like an easy way to become a victim.

[-] riskable@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

I've had my account stalked! Right in the middle of it I switched from Kbin to Lemmy (so I could try out the apps) and had to inform my stalker about the new account.

Frustrated and annoyed at having to look for my posts in many different places, they seem to have given up 🤷

This is a clear win for the Fediverse! I was able to switch instances and get subscribed to all my previous communities in no time at all while this doubled up stalking efforts 👍

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Whenever someone said they checked my post history I immediately considered it a victory and moved on.

[-] gimpchrist@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

That's how I lost my three accounts and I have completely given up

[-] generalpotato@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

100%. I’d even be ok with getting rid voting mechanisms all together. The comment and responses to it should be indicative of it’s quality instead of some vague numerical value which somehow makes it better than the other because more people voted for it based on their own understanding on how a vote works.

Discussions shouldn’t be about what’s popular. Social media has corrupted our ability to have intelligent discussions because non popular viewpoints aren’t entertained anymore and people with non popular viewpoints don’t want to contribute due to the retaliatory nature of likes/votes.

It’s eroding our ability to reason and we need to stop it.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

That and the "hivemind" mentality Reddit encoruages often means you get power-tripping mods banning people, not for doing anything wrong, but for "Dissenting with the group"

The average user is probably banned from a quarter of the site over shit like this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] schmidtster@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

The biggest issue in some places was, even if your opinion is valid, if it didn’t fit the group speak, it would be downvoted regardless.

It wasn’t really a great indicator if your opinion was popular or not, it was more if it got that groups niche.

wasn’t really a great indicator if your opinion was popular or not, it was more if it got that groups niche.

... That's called popular opinion lol.

Of course it matters where you say something. It's literally no different than IRL.

load more comments (6 replies)

That and also many subs wouldn't allow people to participate if they didn't have a high enough karma

[-] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

That was used as a crude spam filter against bots and new accounts

[-] awesome_person@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

Yes, people definitely did. Maybe not a majority but a lot

[-] Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Karma did limit where and how frequently you could post

[-] BembelSommelier@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago

And that makes sense to some degree. I used to mod a large community on re**it and usually rage bait/flaming/troll accounts got filtered out by our automod which was set to 50 karma iirc. Most communities that use a karma filter have it set really low so farming a lot of karma is really unnecessary

[-] nuke@yah.lol 5 points 1 year ago

Y'all act like that can't happen on Lemmy. The total score is already visible via API. Nothing's stopping a community from running a bot that auto removes anyone below a threshold. It's entirely possible right now to write that code.

[-] darthelmet@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I didn’t. If anything I enjoyed the downvotes sometimes. Your downvotes mean nothing

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I always thought it was amusing if I got into an argument with someone and they downvoted each of my comments before replying as if that meant something. Dude, I already get that you don't agree with me. Why are you bothering?

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/5XtAHOepH94

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] InvaderDJ@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Did people actually change what they’d say based on whether or not they thought they’d get upvotes?

I'd argue anyone who did that probably had nothing interesting to say and/or didn't actually care about what they were saying. Same with the people who complained about downvotes.

[-] blanketswithsmallpox@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

/me watches some dude post hateful contrarian bullshit on a light hearted comic.

"It's not even funny and this shit comic comic has been done before. Quit self promoting on reddit bitch!

Edit: Why am I being down voted!? Fuck you know it's true! Mods temp banned me apparently. I don't care I'm never going to block her so I can always down vote!"

Somehow everyone who commented on his parent comment has every comment in their profile down voted for the last 50 comments...

[-] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Oh I remember those, wasn't that the brigading train?

[-] hoodatninja@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think you are envisioning something a little more intentional/thought out than it is. We do this socially all the time. You gauge the audience and you adjust what you’re going to say to better fit it. Or to upset them if you’re trolling but that tends to be more deliberate.

I bet if you took your comments from a hobby sub/forum/group/etc. you frequent, and then one from a meme community, you will find your tone and rhetoric are very different. And again this is not a bad thing! You are doing and saying what is appropriate for the context. It is very natural to do. But the point is you probably don’t sit down and calculate your exact wording. We just sort of do it, and our goal is generally to “fit in“ or get some affirmation from the community we are participating in.

[-] obi_one@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Yep. I remember someone asking on a hiking sub about a backpack. It was a very fashionable and heavy canvas pack. I hike a good bit and have never seen a pack like that being used by others in the trails, so I said that I wouldn't recommend that pack. I think it had like 30-40 down votes. I never gave my opinion on a pack again.

[-] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Bro you are welcome to elaborate here I mean what can be so controversial about a fucking backpack

[-] obi_one@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah right. I learned my lesson the first time. No more opinions from me.

:)

[-] SapienSRC@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Genuine question, and I don't mean any disrespect, if down votes are intended to mean people disagree with you, and you don't know these people, why did you care so much that you won't share your opinion on things again? I've never understood this way of thinking. Maybe I'm just weird but I for the life of me can't imagine caring that much about what strangers think.

[-] Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think the karma system on reddit had a real effect on behaviour. What you often found it did was cause people to write comments for the audience of voters instead of for the person they're responding to. This eliminates personal interaction between users and turns everything into soapboxing. You stop having real conversations with each other, instead it becomes about pandering to votes.

This then also causes people to vote based on this as well. "You're not saying what the group wants to hear" downvote is the voting behaviour it creates.

[-] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

This so frigging much. People are not having conversations, they are posturing.

It's like going into a debate prepared for discussing ideas, and the other debater is going for discussing emotions.

Truly fucked up and patently divisive

[-] Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah it's annoying. Things are far more pleasant when people are actually talking to one another, it creates a more human interaction and you don't get the kind of bad-faith engagement associated with trying to pander to votes. People self-censor far less as a result as well, aside from instance rules.

[-] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The weirdest part is the interactions, I swear to God people is hell bent on their conversations being pre-tainted with assuming the worst possible take on the others side.

It's like petite can't no longer have different thoughts on the matter without going full civil war in the comments

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I certainly never have changed what I said based on popular opinion. If someone convinces me I'm wrong, I'll admit it, but just people downvoting me because they don't like what I have to say? Fine. That's their prerogative.

[-] Selmafudd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The amount of deleted downvoted comments makes me think most people at least change their minds afterwards. Which to me is the real weird part, you hide your opinion so you don't lose useless internet points..

[-] mryessir@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

I agree but when a sincerly comment does not strive how I expected i delete it and take the thought about it to myself.

Obviously I am wrong, then.

You are right.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, and there's a bit of psychology at play

Reddit just shows one score on the post, it doesn't show the exact upvote/downvote number. It's easy to just say "Well everyone else voted this up/down, so I guess I will to", it encourages group think, by design it's meant to be an echo chamber.

Imagine you have a divisive opinion, at the end of an hour you have 9 upvotes and 11 downvotes, so it's at negative one. You're gonna think you're being ignored, and others will think you're unpopular and just downvote you not reading it because it's "What the group is doing"

Reddit is fucking nightmare

load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
1787 points (94.1% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26254 readers
3363 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS