this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
133 points (97.8% liked)

Privacy

31882 readers
588 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ms Luke said the nightmare began after her information was compromised in the Medibank data breach.

She said this was the only breach of her information she was aware of.

Medibank released a statement to the ABC saying none of its customers' passwords were compromised in the breach, and it was therefore in no way connected to what unfolded for Ms Luke.

Ms Luke said hackers took control of her PayPal account, in a credential stuffing attack that affected 35,000 PayPal customers in December.

Credential stuffing is where hackers access an account by using automation to try out username and password pairs sourced from data leaks on various websites.

Ms Luke said over the course of two days from December 6 to 8, her PayPal account was used to make hundreds of fraudulent transactions.

She was then served electronically with papers from the US District Court of Florida outlining Adidas' case against her.

Similar charges against her were also filed by the National Basketball Association in the District Court of Illinois.

In both cases, Adidas and the NBA were given leave by the courts to run the cases ex parte — without a requirement for all parties in the case to be present.

In court documents seen by the ABC, default judgements were handed down by the US courts and damages were awarded against Ms Luke of $US200,000 ($293,000) in the NBA case and $US1million ($1.5 million) in the Adidas matter.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stiephel@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Also she apparently didn't attend court, so the companies were awarded default judgments since there was no challenge.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 40 points 1 year ago

She is a single parent with four children, living in an entirely different country on the other side of the world; it would have been pretty amazing if she actually showed up.

[–] PeachMan@lemmy.one 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She's an Australian citizen, it would be idiotic to expect her to fly to America to attend a trial for something she didn't do. If I got a letter from an Australian court telling me I had to fly there to defend myself, I'd tell them to fuck off.

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Simpsons did it