this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
53 points (86.3% liked)

Privacy

516 readers
249 users here now

Protect your privacy in the digital world

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

~PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!~

  1. Be nice and no bigotry/prejudice
  2. No tankies/alt-right fascists. The former can be tolerated but the latter are banned
  3. Stay on topic
  4. Don't promote proprietary software
  5. No crypto
  6. No Xitter links
  7. If you post news exclusive to a country please name it. ~(This isn't a bannable rule, just a recommendation!)~

Related communities

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There's no viable alternative in the US.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

There is, just too many people refuse to use something more modern than 1987.

I'm going to save this video for family and friends who refuse to switch. It probably won't change their minds today...

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Switch to what? I said "viable" but I meant realistic. It's not realistic that I will convince two hockey teams, my friends, my brother, my parents, my wife, my wife's parents, my kid's daycare, or anyone else to move to a new platform.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh, for sure.

Even though there are numerous easy to switch to, more private, robust, platform agnostic, and synchronizing apps out there.

It's arguable that even Telegram is more private than SMS.

I'm mostly willing to use whatever someone has, provided it's not one of the great offenders like WhatsApp. While I don't care for Signal (mostly becuase it doesn't have desktop sync, yet), I'll happily use it with anyone who has it. Or Teleguard, Telegram, XMPP (my preferred), etc.

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I try to talk people into Signal, but no one cares and I look insane.

[–] fuzzzerd@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago

Were adrift on a ship of fools.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago

Start sending them faked messages.

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

Don't be surprised if "I've been sending texts for decades and nothing bad has happened" turns out to be a stronger case than "the YouTube video onomatopoeia send me".

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What are you talking about? There are literally hundreds? What's not viable about them?

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Convincing someone else to use them.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That's nothing to do with viability.

[–] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It has everything to do with viability. Something is not a viable alternative if no one can be convinced to use it.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They can be convinced. They just haven't been. That's not the same thing. Not viable means not capable.

[–] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, not really.

Viable: “the ability to live, grow, and develop” or “the ability to function adequately” or “the ability to succeed or be sustained”

Source: the dictionary

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Take your pic of any of those, it's still not that.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"sustained" is relevant.

I'm guessing if "literally" is your best adverb, then you may not be practiced in supporting normies trying to cope with seemingly capricious tech changes.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -3 points 2 days ago

"sustained" is relevant.

User adoption does not make it sustainable. Many of them are nothing more than protocols. Code. It lives forever even if there are zero users.

I'm guessing if "literally" is your best adverb

I think you have me confused with another poster but thanks for the personal insult.

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ok, I understand your frustration. I've already mentioned in another comment that I used the wrong word. Thank you for bringing it to my attention. In the future I will use the correct terminology as to not frustrate you or portray a message in the incorrect form. I hope that I have caused you no inconvenience and wish for your forgiveness. Please do not hold these actions against me, as I do not intend to make such embarrassing and hurtful mistakes in the future.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wow. Uhhhh that was an unnecessarily long and possibly sarcastic apology but I forgive you regardless.

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I want to sincerely thank you for your forgiveness—it means more to me than words can express. Your ability to extend grace and understanding has truly humbled me, and I’m incredibly grateful for the second chance you've given me. Asking for forgiveness was not easy, but I now realize just how vital it is for healing and growth. It’s a reminder of the strength it takes to acknowledge our mistakes and the kindness that forgiveness brings, not just to the one being forgiven, but to the one doing the forgiving as well. Your compassion has taught me a lot, and I will carry that lesson with me moving forward.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -2 points 2 days ago

Sarcasm confirmed.