this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
64 points (84.0% liked)

Linux

5756 readers
565 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out !linux_memes@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tiramichu@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why?

Genuine question. I haven't really used peertube.

[–] TheFederatedPipe@fedia.io 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Your IP gets exposed to others since it has a p2p feature to share the bandwidth of the video with others.

[–] tiramichu@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago

Makes sense, thanks

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's true for a lot of services. Your IP address doesn't really matter much. P2P is way better for performance.

What are people going to do with your IP? The worst they can do is do a Geo lookup. However it doesn't matter.

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I could scan your network for vulnerabilities.

I could anyway but knowing a target used a service like peertube increases the odds of unpatched hardware or self hosted services in my experience.

If you’re using an older router you probably have a problem due to unpatched vulnerabilities.

If you self host you might have a problem, as many package maintainers and developers lag a bit behind security patches.

A good VPN provider will also block unusual ports.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You are welcome to scan my public IP. There are bots scanning it every few seconds. If there was a vulnerability it would be exploited in the matter of a few minutes.

Also, you have no way of knowing who is behind a website. That's why web browsers have strong security mechanisms. It is by necessity.

VPNs do very little. However, VPN companies want to keep up the fear mongering to make money.

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If there was a vulnerability it would be exploited in the matter of a few minutes.

Around 10 minutes for an unpatched XP box with no firewall.

Much longer for obscure vulnerabilities in routers or more difficult to exploit vulns in hosted software.

It is also possible for vulnerabilities in peertube itself to exist, which will be an issue regardless of VPN use.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

VPN's have zero impact on that

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That depends on whether they are port blocking as I said.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why wouldn't you port block on your Firewall? For that matter, why do you have any ports exposed to begin with.

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Like I said, people doing self hosting, they often open up ports for those services and management ports.

Some routers have backdoors built in, such as the Fortinet NGFW backdoor, that can also be exploited.

I work in this industry and believe me the risk is real, no vpns aren’t a silver bullet, but there are a few good providers out there that can help mitigate some risks of using P2P for more than piracy.

[–] florge@feddit.uk 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Probably because you don't want your IP address to be associated with some of stuff on there.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why? You aren't committing a crime

Maybe you shouldn't vote since they have cameras at the booth

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Where are you that there are cameras in the booth?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

At the booth

They have security cameras everywhere these days

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That would be illegal in Australia and I have to imagine most functional democracies since it has the potential to link voters to votes and undermine the electoral process.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Welcome to mass surveillance. It is not illegal if it is in the name of crime stopping. Whats worse is that Australia has laws that require companies to back door everything.

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 2 points 2 days ago

Worth clarifying that it requires individuals to insert backdoors if told to, it's not a blanket backdoor and frankly I'd be shocked if it held up in the high court.

Nothing ever makes it there though, and it's full of baked in secrecy. I don't use local or US services for anything where privacy is important for that reason.

Good thing Australia doesn't have electronic voting, hey?