this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2025
379 points (98.5% liked)

In Person Activism

385 readers
15 users here now

"Power wants your body softening in your chair and your emotions dissipating on the screen. Get outside. Put your body in unfamiliar places with unfamiliar people. Make new friends and march with them." -Tim Snyder

A community for sharing information about ways to get involved with real world activism to make the world a better place.

Spend less time arguing about politics on the internet. The world is in trouble. Get out there and try to help.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Is it legal to share the faces and names of ICE agents?

Can we just compile a massive database of every agent?

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

At the moment who the fuck cares about it being legal? When the law is unjust it must be broken.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Its easier to convince people to do something when its still legal.

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] null@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What an odd reaction to a very obvious fact...

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 0 points 4 days ago

It's just shit and worrying that people care more about legality than doing the right thing. If only we didn't live in a culture that conditioned them so.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 14 points 4 days ago (5 children)

IANAL but probably not legal due to them having rights to their photos and you can be sure they will find some legal way to shut you down.

However an face recognition api trained with such photos might fly under the radar or even be legal.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 4 days ago

IANAL

I continue to absolutely ADORE the fact that the abbreviation for "I am not a lawyer" sounds like an Isaac Asimov porn parody 😁🥰

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

legal due to them having rights to their photos

Well, this is the USA with First amendment rights. I heard that in Europe, there are more privacy protections, but in the US, people commonly take pictures of people in public.

There are cases of police brutality in the US where people recorded videos of the entire thing, and it was spread online, and it was mostly not taken down. I'm not sure if they actually have "right" to their photos, as Europeans do.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In Europe you can photograph/film public scenes legally and if it happens that a person is recognizable on it they have only limited recourse, but specifically taking photos of faces and publishing them is another matter. I imagine this isn't so different in the US.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 days ago

Also not a lawyer, but it's my understanding no one has an expectation of privacy in a public place. There isn't an exception for officers of the law. I'm reasonably confident there's no legal basis to block you from taking pictures or videos of them. They could harass you for doing so, but I don't think they can legally stop you.

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

If they're acting in a capacity for the government, they're public servants with no expectations of privacy. Also, if you're in public, there's no expectations of privacy as is.

Take their photos and film them. Let them know they're being watched and their actions will be scrutinized. Authoritarians are less likely to escalate if there's evidence and they think there will be some kind of consequences. And they just have to wonder if some Mario will go green some day.

[–] bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 days ago

Facial recognition software is super ubiquitous. Hosting some VMs with some plugin for this should be trivial.