this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
716 points (98.8% liked)

science

15219 readers
641 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We Just Got More Evidence That Long COVID Is a Brain Injury

The exact nature of long COVID is still coming to light, but we just got some of the best evidence yet that this debilitating condition stems from a brain injury.

Using high-resolution scanners, researchers at the Universities of Cambridge and Oxford have shown microscopic, structural abnormalities in the brainstems of those recovering from COVID-19.

Signs of brain inflammation were present up to 18 months after first contracting the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

"We show that the brainstem is a site of vulnerability to long-term effects of COVID-19, with persistent changes evident in the months after hospitalization," the authors of the study conclude.

https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awae215

#health #science #biology #news @science@lemmy.world @science@beehaw.org @news@lemmy.world @health@lemmy.world @usnews@beehaw.org

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Definition 1: a theory that explains an event or set of circumstances as the result of a secret plot by usually powerful conspirators

Definition 2: a theory asserting that a secret of great importance is being kept from the public

The point here is that a lab leak is no longer a debunked conspiracy theory.

You want a conspiracy theory? Republicans have a narrative to drive and they're in all the committees and are still running several of those agencies. There's a disagreement at best that it did or didn't happen while the people investigating have a stated agenda. That is not, by definition. Debunked or Debunking.

This is what people always say when

See definition 1 and 2

However McDonald’s does force their franchises to buy a particular piece of equipment that breaks easily

See definition 1 and 2

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's a disagreement at best that it did or didn't happen while the people investigating have a stated agenda. That is not Debunking.

Daszak effectively silenced debate over the possibility of a lab leak with a February 2020 statement in the Lancet. “We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that covid-19 does not have a natural origin,”

Peter Daszak is a British Zoologist. Not a Republican politician.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yup, he's anti-conspiracy which is correct.

it wasn't a conspiracy that was proved to be a conspiracy

Finally we agree. Like everything else in the above list, this is a theory that was claimed to be false that later turns out to be correct.

The lab leak conspiracy hypothesis was initally denied by the lead investigator, Peter Daszak, and now turns out to be highly probable (almost certain given the lack of zoonotic spillover evidence).