this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2025
157 points (99.4% liked)

Science Fiction

14143 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to /c/ScienceFiction

December book club canceled. Short stories instead!

We are a community for discussing all things Science Fiction. We want this to be a place for members to discuss and share everything they love about Science Fiction, whether that be books, movies, TV shows and more. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow.

  1. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.
  2. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.
  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed
  4. Put (Spoilers) in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers.
  5. Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread.

Lemmy World Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As an example, I love the Martian, and I think a lot of older books from authors like Asimov are heavily into engineering / competence porn. Other favs in this category include the standalone novel Rendezvous with Rama to leave you wishing for more, most of the Culture series for happy utopian vibes, Schlock Mercenary for humor, Dahak series for fun mindless popcorn.

Edit: I'm so happy to have found a replacement for r/books and the rest of them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Subverb@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The Three Body Problem is bad. The hype for the book is a good example of "The Emporer's New Clothes".

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

It’s a little bit of a slog. There are a lot of cultural references, plot devices, characters, and ways of moving through the story that are literally foreign to the western mind. Odd injections of what feels like philosophy. At least the version I read. Once you get used to it it gets better.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I was surprised at how little I liked it given the hype.

[–] Subverb@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I did enjoy the parts about the Cultural Revolution and some of the dialog from Da Shi. That's about it.

[–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I have finished the series and absolutely loved it.

Could you please explain why you consider it bad?

[–] Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I found the third book very weak, albiet with some interesting ideas.

Also, made it clear that he can't write women at all.

I found them overall fine to good, except the main character's chapters in the final 2/3rd of Book 3 which were just kinda bleh by the end.

Book 1 was strong idea explored well.

Book 2 felt good at the time, but I think feels weaker in hindsight but was some more interesting ideas.

[–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Most western sci-fi authors are shit at writing women. So I didn’t hold it against him. But sure, I can see how some people didn’t take to it.

To me, it was a beautiful series with loads of interesting and horrible twists and turns. The ending is sublime, to me.

[–] Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

Most sci-fi authors who can't write women don't make them the symbolism laden protagonist of their trilogy's conclusion.

Not sure if I should give him points for effort there or not.

Despite my complaints, I do think it worth a read.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I loved it for the game theory, ideas, and what-if aspects. The characters however, were flat 2D cutouts. I can't say how much of that was due to translation issues, if any.

[–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I dunno. Most sci-fi I read from western authors is horrible with their characters. Maybe because I’m mostly reading older sci-fi? Either ways, I didn’t hold that against him or the story.