this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
14 points (81.8% liked)

Anarchism

3761 readers
2 users here now

Are you an Anarchist? The answer might surprise you!

Rules:

  1. Be respectful
  2. Don't be a nazi
  3. Argue about the point and not the person
  4. This is not the place to debate the merits of anarchism itself. While discussion is encouraged, getting in your “epic dunks on the anarkiddies” is not. As a result of the instance’s poor moderation policies and hostility toward anarchists by default, lemmygrad users are encouraged not to post here, though not explicitly disallowed if they aren’t just looking to start a fight.

See also:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
poVoq@slrpnk.net
sexy_peach@feddit.de
14
Anarchists should rethink common vs private property (mastodon.social)
submitted 1 year ago by jlou@mastodon.social to c/anarchism@lemmy.ml
83 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Anarchists should rethink common vs private property
https://www.ellerman.org/rethinking-common-vs-private-property/
@anarchism

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Many anarchists criticism of private property rests on the idea that it is the root cause of the capitalist’s legal right to appropriate the fruits of their employees’ labor.

This is the Marxist analysis (as also pointed out in the article), not one commonly shared by Anarchists.

I don't think the argument in the article is particularly new or enlightening, and in fact the proposed democratic company is apparently modelled after Mondragon, which was founded on Anarchist ideas nearly 70 years ago.

[–] jlou@mastodon.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Believing the statement I made there is not limited to Marxists. I have found many anarchists believe the statement when challenged on private property (in products of labor) from an individualist anarchist perspective.

In a sense, Proudhon has made a similar argument to Ellerman, but he did not fully draw the connection to principles of responsibility to ethically justify inalienability of that right. That connection is valuable because it makes it much harder to deny the conclusion