this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2025
191 points (95.3% liked)

World News

39504 readers
1783 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump suggested using "economic force" to acquire Canada, citing trade deficits and national security benefits.

He also claimed the U.S. "subsidizes" Canada by up to $200 billion annually.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau dismissed the idea, saying, "there isn’t a snowball’s chance in hell" Canada would join the U.S.

Meanwhile, U.S. President Joe Biden praised Trudeau’s leadership as he prepares to leave office amidst rising U.S.-Canada trade tensions and tariff threats under Trump.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because he has real political power.

[–] vodkasolution@feddit.it 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Very limited, compared to his predecessors. Plus, he's got a lot less money to invest/spend. Not my problem (I'm not a US citizen nor I live in the US) but his voters too should be able to separate his fuckery from his actual political actions (whatever they will be)

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Plus, he's got a lot less money to invest/spend

The richest man in the world is backing him and is part of his government. There's no bottom to his access to wealth. Entire militaries and governments are beholden to Melon...

[–] vodkasolution@feddit.it 2 points 20 hours ago

A lot of rich men are behind the other leaders, and their business are not space and cars...

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How is it more limited when his party also controls the house, senate, and Supreme Court?

[–] vodkasolution@feddit.it 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Limited in the world, it's not the 80s anymore, not even the 90s or the 00s...back then a US President was the closer thing humanity had to a world leader

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 2 points 19 hours ago

In that sense you are probably right, but I would say he has more power to make bad decisions that can still seriously fuck shit up abroad than any president from those decades too.