this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
223 points (97.9% liked)

196

16780 readers
3196 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I’m not religious nor Catholic but I never saw how scientific theory conflicted with the idea of god. Couldn’t it all just be “gods plan?” Sounds like the Catholic position is similar to that.

[–] GodyGade@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's mostly about the creation of man. The bible says we were created in his image. And most take that to mean, we've always been and looked this way. They haven't considered god might have looked like ape or something from the soup of life's creation. It the conventional interpretation that doesn't jibe. And if Darwin had written "ascend" instead, maybe it wouldn't have been as controversial.

[–] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

Yeah see that still works out to me as if there is a god similar to the abrahamic conception, all of life has been created in their image. From bacteria to man.