this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2024
86 points (81.6% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

55258 readers
372 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hello everyone,

I recently came across an article on TorrentFreak about the BitTorrent protocol and found myself wondering if it has remained relevant in today's digital landscape. Given the rapid advancements in technology, I was curious to know if BitTorrent has been surpassed by a more efficient protocol, or if it continues to hold its ground (like I2P?).

Thank you for your insights!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ComradeMiao@lemmy.dbzer0.com 102 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Most piracy is either two ancient methods that work perfectly of Usenet or BitTorrent. There is nothing wrong with these methods.

[–] finley@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Considering that USENET goes back to the 70s, and bittorrent was invented in 2001, one of these things is clearly ancient and the other isn’t.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 70 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

2001 was 24 years ago in 2 days. BitTorrent can drink.

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago

It's still newer than HTML, CSS, and Javascript.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I dislike this fact, because I very clearly remember when it was brand spanking new

[–] greenshirtdenimjeans@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah and each torrent was its own separate window with no pause option.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 week ago

Haha yes! 20 little BitTorrent windows ticking along

[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I remember when eDonkey and later eMule were brand spanking new... It took quite a while for BitTorrent to gain enough traction (and for me to get fast enough internet) for it to be better... (and, frankly, I still miss eMule's Kademlia network's peer to peer search capabilities...)

[–] supervent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

Ed2k/kad are still kicking, I use mldonkey for that networks

[–] ComradeMiao@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago

Yeah that’s pretty ancient to me. That’s like saying XP isn’t ancient

[–] vorpuni@jlai.lu 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Usenet has many things wrong with it, NNTP is not at all designed for distributing large files, it's for propagating messages across servers. File integrity checks have to be tacked on for instance, and the few servers still serving binaries are commercial services that are vulnerable to copyright trolls.

[–] ComradeMiao@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

Thanks for explaining. I don’t use it.

Good to know